Forbidden knowledge Forward 2

"The development of the conception of Satan as the personal power of evil, who had his counterpart in the archangel Michael, the angelic champion of Israel, God's people, and so of God's purpose of creation, was probably developed after c. 500 B.C. under the influence of Persian Zoroastrian belief in the two conflicting spirits of good and evil, respectively Ahuramazda and Angramainyu, and their angelic hierarchies.

However we have seperated "Israel" and the archangel from each other because Israel was following a false god, one not connected to Michael or the true God. Therefore god's people must be Enlil/Baal/Jehovah/Yahweh worshipers. The Roman Church perpetuted this. Did they know the difference? - - Why was Jesus born amoung these people? - - Because he was there to teach them about the unknown God. These teachings are recorded in the Nag Hammidi scrolls. When the church tries to tell you to ignore these teachings, they are once again denighing access to the true God.

Eve did not come from Adam's rib! She is seperate! She is equal!... and she was created as the first human with 'knowledge'!

Since Eve took the first 'bite' (A medifore) of knowledge, She teaches Adam about the true God. Her mother's name is Sophia(Ninki) in the Nag Hammidi texts. Sophia is the earthly imbodyment of The Divine Shekinah - God's Wife!

Further Adam says, "Then the God, who created us, created a son from himself and Eve, your mother. I knew sweet desire for your mother. Then the vigor of our eternal knowledge was destroyed in us, and weakness pursued us. Therefore the days of our lives became few. For I knew that I had come under the authority of death... "Enlil"!

"Now then, my son Seth, I will reveal to you the things which those men whom I saw before me at first revealed to me after I have completed the times of this generation and the years of the generation has been accomplished."

We see from this that "The God who created them created a 'son' from himself and Eve". This son is Seth. The Nag texts also say Eve is not Cain's mother however. The bible clearly says, "With the help of the LORD, I brought forth a son"! When you read the Nag texts, this means the 'Lord' raped her and this version is verified in the Sumerian texts when Enlil rapes a nurse! The nurse isn't Eve, she is Ninmah/Sud. They are then exiled.
Sud reigned with Enlil; she was given the title Ninti and bore Nannar/Sin, the first Nibiran Royal born on Earth.(Sin is Cain/KA.IN) In the Nag, a 'copy' of Eve is the rape victim. This 'copy' is often referred to as Lillith and as the Jews thought, Adam's first wife. see Rape

The Nag Hammidi scrolls also describe Seth as being the only son of Adam and Eve and the 'God who created us' as Adam says - is not the true God. It also describes this god as the 'authority of death' as he will not let them near 'the Tree of Eternal Life', also known as 'Immortality'.

As for the loss of immortality, ... "A flaming sword to block the path to the Tree of Life" Genesis 3:24. As you might guess this didn't really happen either, at least like this.... because the creator God just throws Adam and Eve out of the garden....and tells them they have to work. But again, he threw them out because they did not OBEY him!
Fear and Control!

This from The Gospel of Philip in the Nag Hammidi Scrolls; "The rulers (archons/Elohim) wanted to deceive man, since they saw that he had a kinship with those that are truly good. They took the name of those that are good and gave it to those that are not good, so that through the names they might deceive him and bind them to those that are not good. And afterward, what a favor they do for them! They make them be removed from those that are not good and place them among those that are good. These things they knew, for they wanted to take the free man and make him a slave to them forever".

"God is a man-eater. For this reason, men are sacrificed to him. Before men were sacrificed, animals were being sacrificed, since those to whom they were sacrificed were not gods."

"If one goes down into the water and comes up without having received anything, and says "I am a Christian," he has borrowed the name at interest. But if he receives the Holy Spirit, he has the name as a gift. He who has received a gift does not have to give it back, but of him who has borrowed it at interest, payment is demanded. This is the way it happens to one when he experiences a mystery."

We have a hidden page which explains what immortality really is and how we all have access to it.
"Life after death" - "Yet he were dead so shall he live"

The real truth

God's Laws

Most of us live by a moral code. Those of us who live by this code would never commit what Adam described as a 'foul deed'. These would include murder, rape, theft, disrespecting our parents, using God's name in vain, bearing false witness, coveting something, commiting adultry, worshiping a graven image and having another God take the place of the one who has taught us the truth. There is, in The Egyptian Book of the Dead, also the mention of a man not to have lain with other men and there are other forbidden deeds. These are the origional 10 commandments. They are over 10,000 years old.

Masons must live by this moral code and God's laws. One that doesn't would be kicked out of the organization.

Other than these moral laws, the kind of controlling obidence and FEAR of God we see above as applied to the Hebrews is inheriently wrong. No one should have to fear God. This contridictory description of God as being a 'loving' and 'forgiving' God and that we should fear him at the same time isn't logical at all. We have come to except that fear is associated with control. God does not control you..unless you fear him? How can you love somebody that you FEAR? How can they love you if all they want to do is control you?
We now teach abused women to get out of 'fear' and 'control' relationships and there are shelters to hide them and their children from their abusers.
The 'Fear of God' was instilled in the Jews by Enlil. It became a doctrine of the church to continue to control you!..and this is evident in all the scrolls they don't want you to read!

This obidence and 'fear' of God began with the Babyloians and was passed to the Hebrews by Levite priests who also demanded 'blood' sacrifices be made to this god. This also involved the butcher of babies. This god they feared isn't the same god we know as a loving and forgiving God and he wouldn't approve of the spilling of blood or murder.

Certainly, human sacrifice was not unknown among the Israelites. We still have a few mentions of it in the Bible where the translators were not careful enough to, clean it up. For example take the story Jephthah’s daughter. I find no record that God said “stop.” Instead, it appears that the girl, Adah, was sacrificed.

We also read that they allowed their sons and daughters to pass through the fire to “Molech”. Rather than being a pagan god, Molech, is merely the word Melech with the vowels from the word “hosheth” i.e. shamefully, substituted. In plain words the sacrifies of the children were made to Yahweh himself, the king of the gods. Again, more than one!

The place where children were sacrificed was called a 'tophet' and a tophet has been found just outside the walls of Jerusalem in the valley of Hinnmon. Or we can say Ge Hinnmon, where comes our word for “hell” Gehenna.”

Micah says “shall I give my first born for my sins?’ In other words is the sacrifice of a son necessary? We find far too much evidence of human sacrifice in our Bible to ignore this as a possibility.

We conclude this discussion with some of the most dramatic, outrageous theories ever taught.

James Ussher (1581-1656), Archbishop of Armagh, Primate of All Ireland, and Vice-Chancellor of Trinity College in Dublin was highly regarded in his day as a churchman and as a scholar.

Having established the first day of creation as Sunday 23 October 4004 BC, by the arguments set forth in the passage below,(see the link) Ussher then calculated the dates of other biblical events, concluding, for example, that Adam and Eve were driven from Paradise on Monday 10 November 4004 BC, and that the ark touched down on Mt Ararat on 5 May 1491 BC on a Wednesday'. see Ussher

Scientific investigations and archaeological discoveries have proven all of this is incorrect!
So what we have here is all MAN-MADE Doctrine!

First, historic Christianity was discredited by the claim that all the prominent commentaries, all the church fathers, and even the Reformers were deluded by "man-made doctrines." Second, new revelation was claimed. Darby claimed to have received "new truth" or at other times "rediscovered truth" that had been lost since the apostles. Third, enthusiasm was whipped up on the pretense that Christ's coming was imminent. Frequent false predictions did not seem to deter this enthusiasm.

Only 365 years ago, the Italian scientist Galileo announced that the Earth was in motion around the sun (a discovery by the Polish astronomer, Copernicus) and for this the Church proclaimed him a heretic. As a result, Galileo was hauled before the Catholic Inquisition and kept under house arrest for ten years until he died.

Soon afterwards, Isaac Newton pursued the concept of orbital force, but he too was condemned and it was not until recently, in 1992, that the Church finally admitted that the Earth was in solar orbit. Indeed, it was not until the summer of 1996 that the notion of Hell was abolished by the General Synod of the Anglican Church, and it was this very notion which had caused such problems for Galileo, Newton and others. The Catholic Church, on the other hand, maintains the notion of Hell - and so, in the eyes of Rome, the Anglican Protestants have now become heretics in this regard.

If you have seen the recent documentories on 'The Da Vinci Code', you should be aware that the Merovingian dynasties of France have everything to do with Mary Magdalene and Jesus. It seems to us that if Gregory knew the truth about the Merovingians, he also knew about 'The Magdalene' and he used what ever means necessary to condemn her.

In Constantinople, Gregory attracted attention in controversy with Patriarch Eutychius of Constantinople who had published a dissertation on the corporeality of the imminent general resurrection in which bodies would be incorporeal, to which Gregory contrasted the corporeality of the risen Christ. The heat of argument drew the emperor in as judge, Gregory using an interpreter, for he never learned the rudiments of Greek during his stay. Eutychius' treatise was condemned, and suffered the normal fate of non-orthodox texts, of being publicly burnt.

Gregory's pontificate saw the development of the concepts of penance that became institutionalized in the later Church, that the purifying penance that the soul was to undergo in Purgatory could be begun in this life, through good works, obedience and Christian conduct, making the travails to come lighter and shorter, for only saints were translated directly to heaven. It was an optimistic outlook, which could make the Christian feel more secure about his future.
Anotherwords - brain washed!

Mary Magdalene's reputation as a wanton woman was sealed by 591 when Pope Gregory announced that the Magdalene, Mary of Bethany and the sinner were, in fact, the same woman. (It wasn't until 1969 that the Catholic Church restored them to three separate individuals.) But Magdalene was still portrayed as a whore or a sinner. We found just the opposite to be true. Nothing in the Bible says she was a prostitute. That word was in use way before Jesus' time and it meant the same thing as it does now except for one thing - prostitution was sacred - reserved for temple priestesses who were ordered to preform this service for strangers once a year. They were refered to as Scarlet women or in Greek hierodulai (sacred) women, a word later transformed (via medieval French into English) to 'harlot'. In the early Germanic tongue, they were known as hores (later Anglicised to whores)- a word which meant quite simply 'beloved ones'. As pointed out in Skeat's Etymological Dictionary, these words of high veneration were never interchangable with such words as 'prostitute' or 'adultress', and the now common association was a wholly contrived strategy of the Roman Church in its bid to denigrate the noble status of the sacred priestess.

Also in 591 Gregory announced that 'Satan has horns and 'hooves', and said Gregory, 'and power to control the weather.' Henceforth, horned animals (in particular stags and goats) were considered to be devilish, while the pictorial imagery of satan became even more exaggerated by the addition of a tail, bat's wings and a variety of bodily characteristics based upon the satyrs of Greek mythology. There is also no such character as the Anti-Christ, also created to strike terror into the hearts of man..for one reason only - subjugation...to the church.

Procreation was never meant to be 'sinful' because it was a gift from the Gods. The word 'harlot' which is the word used in the text, simply meant that Mary was not a jew and she did not practice the jewish religion but that also means she was not a 'sinner' which meant 'to miss the mark'.

Little else was written until the Renaissance, when Mary M. became the femme fatale of Christian art and morality plays. She made a neat contrast to the Virgin Mary, repentant whore to the Madonna. She's almost always had long red hair and revealing clothing, and carried an alabaster jar of precious oils.

The Eastern Orthodox Christians never accepted the tainted version of Magdalene. According to one legend, she and Jesus's mother went to Ephesus to teach. Another has her in Rome appearing before Emperor Tiberius. When she tells him the story of the resurrection, he replies that a man could no more rise from the dead than an egg could turn red. Mary picks up an egg and it turns bright red. Icons often depict her holding an egg, and Orthodox Christians still color their Easter eggs red.

This account may be less than accurate. Since the Romans had just executed Jesus, it is unlikely that she really did that since her own life may have been in danger. Nonetheless, she is remembered as a woman of great courage who participated fully in spreading the teachings of Jesus.

Western myths are even more dramatic. Magdalene's cult is based in southern France, where she supposedly fled for safety with Lazarus and his sister, Martha. Early French literature tells of her arrival on the shores of Provence. Her Feast Day, July 22, was a major celebration in France during the Middle Ages and is observed to this day. There is plentiful evidence that Mary is buried in France and we will discuss this on our 'Jesus series'.

On the History channel, a show intitled Digging for the truth, hosted by adventurer Josh Bernstein, President and CEO of the world's oldest and largest wilderness survival school goes to France to collect DNA from a Merovingian Queen called Aregund. She was the wife of Clotaire I , king of the Franks, and the mother of Chilperic I of Neustria . She was the sister of Ingund, one of Clotaire's other wives. She may have been born sometime between 500 and 510 and may have died sometime between 580 and 590 .

She was located in the crypts below Saint Denis Basilica in Paris . The test was conducted to see if it showed any Middle Eastern characteristics. It did not. It is not known why Bernstein chose to test the DNA of the wife of a Merovingian king as opposed to a direct discendent of the Merovingian line, which logically would have been the only way to test the hypothetical Middle-Eastern origin of the Merovingian bloodline.

Did Leonardo have secret knowledge? Was he really a member of the Priory of Sion?

Author and historian Elaine Pagels reveals her explaination of The truth at the heart of `The Da Vinci Code'

Quote: "What is compelling about Brown's work of fiction, and part of what may be worrying Catholic and evangelical leaders, is not the book's many falsehoods. What has kept Brown on the bestseller list for years and inspired a movie is, instead, what is true -- that some views of Christian history were buried for centuries because leaders of the early Catholic Church wanted to present one version of Jesus' life: theirs."
ELAINE PAGELS, author of ``The Gnostic Gospels'' and ``Beyond Belief: The Secret Gospel of Thomas,'' is a professor of religion at Princeton. She wrote this article for Perspective.

What other 'ideas' were concocted by the saintly patrons of the church?

We know it was Augustine who promoted the idea of ‘Original Sin’ as inherited and carried forward as a result of human sexuality; and it was through Augustine that a manichean type neo-platonism became firmly joined to Christianity. This doctrine blamed Eve for the fall of humanity. It condemned women to the subservency of men and created social problems that still plaque us. Attitudes about women, sexuality, marriage, motherhood, work and our relationship to the environment have all been deeply affected by Christian interpretations. Texts found hidden away for centuries disclose a different viewpoint ascribed to by Jesus where he praises women - especially mothers. The disciples declare Mary Magdalene to be the 'woman who knows the all' in the Nag Hammidi scrolls, so why isn't it safe to assume that perhaps something else is being hidden from us? Myths are myths for one reason...Because the truth is dangerous!

In the early centuries of the Christian era, spiritual trends were largely determined by the thoughts and deeds of the saints; and Augustine’s theological essays with all their pagan colorings, assumed an immediate dogmatic importance for all Christianity. It has been said that Augustine’s influence on Christianity is second only to St. Paul; and theologians, Roman Catholic and Protestants alike, look upon him as the founder of theology.

What is Theology ? The term theologia is used in Classical Greek literature, with the meaning "discourse on the gods or cosmology". Since the authority of Hellenistic city states was partly based on religious observance, those who first sought to ask difficult questions about the gods were often viewed as heretics, or in the language of the day "atheists". Socrates is famous for having been condemned to death for teaching youths atheism (though in fact he had not). Plato, his pupil, wrote several discourses on the gods, though his doctrine of forms and emanations would be more significant for later Theology. In scholastic Latin sources, the term came to denote the rational study of the doctrines of the Christian religion, or (more precisely) the academic discipline which investigated the coherence and implications of the language and claims of the Bible and of the theological tradition (the latter often as represented in Peter Lombard's Sentences, a book of extracts from the Church Fathers).
Anotherwords - A set of MAN MADE DOCTRINES!

The doctrine of the Holy Spirit .
In mainstream Christianity, the Holy Spirit is one person of the Trinity, co-equal with the Father (God) and the Son (Jesus) - Usually described as 'he' or a male figure. Other Christians declare that God is both female and male. We found that the Holy Spirit is female. (from the Nag Hammidi Scrolls) Gnostics sometimes ascribe the name "Sophia" to the Holy Spirit. Goddesses were origionaly a part of every religious culture, but their importance was slowly taken away by a male dominated society. The sacred feminine was replaced by celibacy and sexuality became inferior to it.

The Old testament is, of course, translated from the Hebrew texts and in Hebrew the word for "Goddess" also means "abomination," often in reference to Astarte. But wasn't Solomon susposed to have worshiped Astarte? Islamic interpretations consider the Holy Spirit to be another name for the archangel Gabriel. What we see is that each religion has it own interpretation of the Holy Spirit - again theology as interpretated by each religious sect.
Rules made by Men!

According to this - The devil is a dragon.. not anything else..not a serpent, not a Cerubim.. Rev 12:9 And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan.

On the next page you will see this word again in it's correct context.
So..the whole story about a Lucifer being the devil is pure fiction...and the Dragon depicted as 'evil' is also not true..
There are NO scriptural connectons between the bits and pieces that make up that myth and what the Bible has to say about Satan.

All teaching that opposed those of the church were designated antichrists or satanists....and it remains so today.

We have already established that the 'fallen angels' - Nephilim, are indeed the sons of a god. What we have here is a concerted effort by the church to confuse the entire issue until you are at a complete loss to explain any of it.
So where did the New Testament originate? Keeping in mind that it was written between 70 and 90 AD after the fall of Jerusalem - by a man who never knew Jesus or his brothers. Recent documented evidence presented by the History channel called, 'Who wrote the New Testament' tells a different story. This evidence tells us there are no original copies left of Paul's letters and they were written by different authors at different times. Is this another secret the church has been keeping? This man was a Roman citizen and never a true disciple, but he apparently knew the true teachings which were rewritten by the clergy to suit their own agenda. So there is much more to this than meets the eye.

Continued on Forbidden Knowledge

Search this site

Our search Engine does not search for the links in this site, only words in the text.

NO PART OF THIS SITE MAY BE COPIED OR REPRODUCED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE WEBMASTER. c COPYRIGHT 1999 - 2009 C.I.C...ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

"Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds" -- Albert Einstein