Forbidden knowledge Forward 1


Forbidden knowledge Forward 1



Traduzca esta página al español usar FreeTranslation.com
Traduire Cette Page A Français utilisation FreeTranslation.com
Übersetzen Sie Diese Seite Zu Deutsch Gebrauch FreeTranslation.com


eXTReMe Tracker

The true story of Babylon and Nimrod

Here is a very important aspect of what we consider to be incorrect teaching by church leaders. Some of us have been lead to believe that Babylonia was an evil place where men like Nimrod committed a great sin by rebelling against God. What if we said that the god he rebelled against was El or Baal even though the deity is called 'God' in the text which is the reference to only one god.

We read in the Sumerian texts, concerning the crucial conclave that launched Sumer’s great civilization, that “the great Anunnaki who decree the fate” decided that the gods “were too lofty for Man­kind.” The term used-elu in Akkadian-means exactly that: “Lofty Ones”; from it comes the Babylonian, Assyrian, Hebrew, and Ugaritic El-, the term to which the Greeks gave the connotation “god.”

The Gods

From the Sumerian clay tablets: Anu, father of Enki and Enlil, did not reside on Earth but, El, a reference to Enlil, Enki, or Ea and their brothers - sisters, and some children and grandchildren of these gods ruled the Earth.

The Turin Papyrus lists some of the names of the Gods of Egypt like Ra or Marduk, son of Ptah, who was Enki; Geb and Nut, Parents of Osiris and Seth; Osiris, great grand-son of Ra; Seth, brother of Osiris; and Horus, orphan and son of Osiris and Isis; Thoth, son of Enki, and Ninhursag - his wife and sister.
It begins with: I,x - I,21: Ptah and the Great Ennead
I,22 - II,3 : Horus and the Lesser Ennead (?)
II,4 - II,8 : the spirits
II,9 : a mythical group of kings
II,10 : another group of mythical kings (?)
It then lists the human gods like Narmer, Menes etc.

Then we have rulers of Sumeria like; Marduk, son of Enki; Ashtereth, also known as Nin-khursag, wife of Enki;, and Sin, Ninurta, and Sargon, sons of Enlil. Enki had six sons. They were; Marduk, NER.GAL, GABIL, NIN.A.GAL, and DUMU.ZI. These gods of Sumeria are the same gods the Egyptians knew by their Egyptian name. They controlled all of the area of Mesopotamia which included Sudia Arabia, Asia Minor, Africa, Nubia, Ethiopia, Libya, parts of Turkey, Russia, and specificly the Persian Gulf and the Sinai penninsula. Here is The Sumerian King List which lists Dumuzid, "the Shepherd", as the fifth king on the pre-dynastic list.

Sons of Enki "There was a need, the Anunnaki decided, to give mankind “Kingship” as an intermediary between themselves and the human citizenry. All the Sumerian records attest that this major decision was taken during Anu’s visit, at a Council of the Great Gods. The dating of this visit began the actual 'counting of time' from the Hebrew point of view. One Akkadian text ( the Fable of the Tamarisk and the Datepalm) de­scribes thus the meeting that had taken place “in long ago days, in far off times.” "To guide the land and establish the peoples they appointed a king. ... To rule the black-headed, the many peoples."

"The gods of the land, Anu, Enlil and Enki, convened an assembly. Enlil and the gods took counsel; Among them was seated Shamash; Among them was seated Ninmah."

At that time “there was not yet kingship in the land; the rule was held by the gods.” But the Great Council resolved to change that and to grant kingship to mankind. All the Sumerian sources agree that the first royal city was Kish (Cush - after the great flood). The men who were appointed by Enlil to be kings were called LU.GAL, “Mighty Man.” So the first 'Mighty Man' was Nimrod. We find the same record in the Old Testament (Genesis chapter 10): when mankind was establishing its kingdoms.

The incident at the Tower of Babel revolved around the historical Marduk and Nimrod. The historical Marduk was the god Enki's son (who we mentioned above as Anu's son). Enki is Anu's first born. Nannar was Enlil's son.

While the biblical text names the first three capitals as Kish, Babylon, and Erech, the Sumerian King Lists assert that Kingship moved from Kish to Erech and then to Ur, omitting any mention of Babylon. But Babylonia was the entire area. Everyone knows Abraham lived at Ur around 2060 B.C. in it's 3rd dynasty. But the city it's self is much older than that.... Clay Tablets

The apparent discrepancy in the bible has a reason: We believe it has to do with the incident of the Tower of Babel (at Babylon), which the Old Testament records in no small detail. It was an incident, we believe, that had to do with Marduk’s insistence that he, rather than Nannar, should possess Sumer’s next capital, unnamed in the Sumerian text but clearly Babylon, the new capitol.

The time was during the resettlement of the plain of Sumer (the biblical Shin’ar), when new urban centers were being built: "And as they traveled from the east, they found a valley in the Land of Shin’ar and settled there. Genesis 11:2. And they said unto one another: “Let us make bricks, and burn them by fire”; and the brick served them as stone and the bitumen served them as mortar.

Genesis 10:8. (Kish) Cush begot Nimrod; He was the first to be a 'Mighty Man' in the Land. "And the beginning (the first centers) of his kingdom were Babylon and Erech and Akkad, all in the land of Shin’ar (Sumer/Babylonia)." The text goes on to say - 10:11; "From that land he went to Assyria, where he built Nineveh, Rehoboth, IR (UR), Calah and Resen, which is between Nineveh and Calah; that is the great city."

In Masonic legend, Nimrod is credited as being the first 'Mason', that is a 'builder' or 'craftsman'. Study of the biblical texts proves this to be true.

It was then that the scheme which caused the incident was suggested by an unnamed instigator: “Come, let us build us a city, and a tower whose head shall reach the heavens.” “And Yahweh came down to see the city and the tower which the humans were building”; and he said to unnamed colleagues:
“This is just the beginning of their undertakings; from now on, anything that they shall scheme to do shall no longer be impossible for them.” And Yahweh said to his colleagues: “Come, let 'US' go down and confuse their language, so that they would not understand each other. Genesis 11:7.
The Wars of Gods and Men Zecharia Sitchin

Historical evidence from the Sumerian texts suggests that Enlil called in all the foreign fighters he could find to destroy the tower and the rule of Nimrod, because as we might guess Nimrod favored the gods Marduk and Enki. Allot of the fighters stayed in the land and the languages they brought with them remained. Nimrod's revolt was therefore against the rule of Enlil/Yahweh.

Biblical theorists again turned this around to suit their own purpose making Nimrod a 'bad guy'. They use Nimrod to make the argument that since Masonry praises Nimrod, he and therefore Masons worship the devil. This is because they didn't understand how the wording meant something altogther different. After reading the next few pages you will see that Nimrod wasn't a bad guy at all.

A contridiction exists: Enki, the lord of abundance and of steadfast decisions, the wise and knowing lord of the Land, the expert of the gods, chosen for wisdom, the lord of Eridug, shall change the speech in their mouths, as many as he had placed there, and so the speech of mankind is truly one." Which indicates Enki did not want the languages changed.

More proof..most biblical writers condemn Nimrod, and saying he started a pagan tradition, so they label him evil. We think NOT.
Here is how that got started..

Josephus writes; "Now it was Nimrod who excited them to such an affront and contempt of God. He was the grandson of Ham, the son of Noah, a bold man, and of great strength of hand. He persuaded them not to ascribe it to God, as if it was through his means they were happy, but to believe that it was their own courage which procured that happiness. He also gradually changed the government into tyranny, seeing no other way of turning men from the fear of God, but to bring them into a constant dependence on his power. He also said he would be revenged on God, if he should have a mind to drown the world again; for that he would build a tower too high for the waters to be able to reach and that he would avenge himself on God for destroying their forefathers!" We interpret this as; Nimrod is actually fighting against The USURPER god Enlil! from.. Josephus on Nimrod.
"in the face of YHWH" can only mean 'in defiance of YHWH' as Josephus and the Targums understand it (op. cit.: 166).

The Biblical Ham and the Ham of the Book of Jasher

When we read in Genesis 9:22 that Ham discovered his Father's nakedness. This has an allegorical meaning. The Book of Jasher has the real story that the Genesis writers did not understand.

The Comparison: A Sumerian tablet (seen below) shows Eve girdled in a garment around her loins while Adam is still naked because Eve is given knowledge first. "Garments" were "Knowledge!"

Jasher 7:30-30. And the garments of skin which God made for Adam and his wife, when they went out of the garden, were given to Seth.

For after the death of Adam and his wife, the garments were given to Enoch, the son of Jared, and when Enoch was taken up to God, he gave them to Methuselah, his son.

And at the death of Methuselah, Noah took them and brought them to the ark, and they were with him until he went out of the ark.

And in their going out, Ham stole those garments from Noah his father, and he took them and hid them from his brothers.

And when Ham begat his first born Cush, he gave him the garments in secret, and they were with Cush many days.

And Cush also concealed them from his sons and brothers, and when Cush had begotten Nimrod, he gave him those garments through his love for him, and Nimrod grew up, and when he was twenty years old he put on those garments.

Jasher 30-32; And Nimrod became strong when he put on the garments, and God (Enki) gave him might and strength, and he was a mighty hunter in the earth, yea, he was a mighty hunter in the field, and he hunted the animals and he built altars, and he offered upon them the animals before the Lord.

And Nimrod strengthened himself, and he rose up from amongst his brethren, and he fought the battles of his brethren against all their enemies round about.

And the Lord (Enki) delivered all the enemies of his brethren in his hands, and God prospered him from time to time in his battles, and he reigned upon earth.

And when Nimrod was forty years old, at that time there was a war between his brethren and the children of Japheth, so that they were in the power of their enemies. Jasher 7:34.

Jasher 7:35-37. And Nimrod went forth at that time, and he assembled all the sons of Cush and their families, about four hundred and sixty men, and he hired also from some of his friends and acquaintances about eighty men, and be gave them their hire, and he went with them to battle, and when he was on the road, Nimrod strengthened the hearts of the people that went with him.

And he said to them, Do not fear, neither be alarmed, for all our enemies will be delivered into our hands, and you may do with them as you please.

And all the men that went were about five hundred, and they fought against their enemies, and they destroyed them, and subdued them, and Nimrod placed standing officers over them in their respective places.

Book of Jasher 7:45. And all nations and tongues heard of his fame, and they gathered themselves to him, and they bowed down to the earth, and they brought him offerings, and he became their lord and king, and they all dwelt with him in the city at Shinar, and Nimrod reigned in the earth over all the sons of Noah, and they were all under his power and counsel.

And when Nimrod had joyfully returned from battle, after having conquered his enemies, all his brethren, together with those who knew him before, assembled to make him king over them, and they placed the regal crown upon his head.

And he set over his subjects and people, princes, judges, and rulers, as is the custom amongst kings.

And then (Enlil) placed Terah the son of Nahor the prince of his host, and he dignified him and elevated him above all his princes. see Book of Jasher 7
At verse 46 Jasher turns Nimrod into an evil ruler 'who did not go in the ways of the Lord' (Enlil). But we see the end result, as verified in Josephus above because biblical writers eliminated One of the Gods - Enki...... Enlil is "The Lord!"..The Owner of the land and the people!
Enlil had come to take over Enki's domain and Enki was forced to go to Egypt and Africa became his territory. It would then make sence that Enki's followers went with him and that included Ham and his sons and Cush and his sons, ie. Nimrod. The Bible refers to Egypt as "the land of Ham" in (Psalms 78:51; 105:23,27; 106:22; 1Ch 4:40). The Hebrew word for Egypt was Mizraim (probably literally meaning the two lands). This cannot be taken lightly because Ham and his sons become 'Egyptians' at that point.

So we have 'garment's' stolen from Noah by Ham, passed down and concealed by Nimrod. AND we have A GOD who is with him and 'helps him upon the Earth'. The 'garments' of skin must have been some sort of Kingly apparatus designed to grant the bearer power and rulership. Apparently men were only spiritual beings until God (Enki) gave them a 'clothing of skin'. This is repeated in the Lost books of Adam and Eve, The Cave of Treasures And Adam and Eve were in Paradise, and clothed with glory and shining with praise for three hours.

Christian writers turned it into this; "And God made for them tunics of skin which was stripped from the trees, that is to say, of the bark of the trees, because the trees that were in Paradise had soft barks, and they were softer than the byssus and silk wherefrom the garments worn by kings are made. And God dressed them in this soft skin, which was thus spread over a body of infirmities". As we read Genesis 4:21, we find God making garments of skin for Adam and Eve, but the meaning is not the same.

'Garments' were 'knowledge' and godly power or an understanding of the elements combined with magic.

Please be aware that these books were rewritten in Christian times and include Satan, whom we believe did (does not) not exist.

The Real Egyptians

The Hamitic (Ham) people were not negro as evidenced by this Oromo tribesman and the (2) Afar tribe who are the descendents of Cush. Oromo Tribesman Compair this tribesman to King Tut.

If the Babylonian Cush is to be traced to the city of Kish, founded about 3200-3000 B.C. from where the Babylonian emperors of the third millennium B.C. took their royal titles as kings of the world. The Sumerian King List names the dynasty of Kish with twenty-three kings first in the enumeration of Mesopotamian dynasties which reigned after the Flood.

In addition, the Cushitic peoples who live around the Horn of Africa and today comprise the (1) Somali tribe. Popular history gives some insight into the history in the two traditional divisions of the Afar. Tradition indicates that the Asayahamara (The Red Ones) are descended from a group originally invading from the Ethiopian Highlands at one time, who imposed their rule on the Adoyahmara (The White Ones).

The Afar- They are a dark brown people with Caucasian features, similar to the darker Somali and Oromo. They are likewise distantly related to the ancient Beja group of peoples, who are Southern Cushites, and related in turn to the ancient Egyptian race.

History: Little is known of the actual specific history of the Afar people. The Afar claim a descent from Arabs, through a mythic Yemeni ancestor, though they differ racially, linguistically and culturally.This kind of cultural geneological adoption is common among Semitic and Cushitic peoples, such as some Somali clans, who also claim Yemeni Arab descent. Sometimes this reflects cultural ties from an earlier historical period or actual instances of intermarriage, perhaps for a defense alliance. also see The Afar tribe

Canaan [(Final Nun Ayin Nun Caph Vau) Kh(uh)N(aw)A(ah)N, Canaan - Heb. Kena’an, ken-ah’-an, from root Heb. kana’, to bend the knee, humiliate, vanquish, bring down low, subjection, under, humble, subdue, thus humiliated; Kenaan, a son of Ham, also the country inhabited by him, Canaan, merchant, traffic. Found also in Gen. 9:18, 22-26; 10:6; 12:6; 24:3. Canaan denotes the descendants of Ham (Gen. 9:18, 22) who settled in the land later known as Palestine and from whom the country took its original name.

At an early date they succumbed to the pressure of racial and linguistic intermixture with Semites to the loss of their own ethnic predominance. The evidence of the excavation shows the Canaanites were predominantly of Semitic (Shem) rather than Hamitic strain. The etymology of the name is unknown, as is also the earliest history of the name; but Egyptian inscriptions of c. 1800 B.C. use it for the coastland between Egypt and Asia Minor. In the Amarna letters of c. 1400 B.C. the name is applied to the Phoenician coast. The Canaanites were of Semitic stock and were part of a large migration of Semites (Phoenicians, Amorites, Canaanites) from NE Arabia in the third millennium B.C
from The descendents of Noah: The Table of Nations

Scientists thought the color designations came from the reddish soil deserts inland, toward the direction the newcomers came from, and the white saline coastal areas, where the Adoyahamara are still more numerous. This evidence makes that pretty silly.
The Reds remain socially dominant, and claim ownership of the lands, while the Whites tend to be the herders. Both classes are, however, distributed among all the clans of the tribe.

We have made it a point to show diverse human cultures and races. We have seen the tribes that descended from Ham's sons (Cush). We have shown that the Egyptians are directly related to the the Ham/Cush clan. Backed up by Bible verses, that leaves little doubt that Ham and his sons left Babylonia and went to Egypt and established the 1st Dynasty of Egypt. They were following Marduk and they were loyal to him and his Father, the God Enki. We have evidence of how and when this took place on Hiram Intro 2.

The other question; Are we to believe that a genetic mutation lead to all the different races from Noah's sons after the Flood? HARDLEY!
There isn't ONE scientist anywhere that cares to tackle this question!

The Evolution of Humans is a lie! God created man in his own image, in his own likeness..

In the gnostic The Apocalypse of Adam, Adam warns his sons against the 'false powers' of the Earth'. He sees men he does not recognize but concludes they are angels sent from God. He attributes his knowledge to Eve, who taught him about the True God. He than says,"Then God, the ruler of the aeons and the powers, divided us in wrath....meaning another god made him obedient and fearful - so he tells his sons they must 'obey' this 'ruler of the Earth'.(Enlil)

The prototype of the great fight in heaven between the powers of light and darkness is found in ancient Egyptian religious texts, in more than one form. In the oldest form Set(h), the Devil, rebels against Her-ur (Horus), the god of heaven, whose chief symbols are the sun and moon, and is utterly defeated. In the next form Set attacks the Sun-god Ra, and is destroyed by him; the great ally of Set, called Apep (Apôphis), and all his fiends and devils (the Sebau), are defeated and burnt up daily. In another form Set makes war on Horus, the son of Osiris, and on Osiris himself, and is defeated utterly. The Coptic version of the legend was borrowed from the old hieroglyphic texts, and then Christianized to include a devil instead of Enlil.

We conclude from this that no one should have to FEAR God!

Biblical writers associate Gilgamesh with Nimrod. This is not true at all. Gilgamesh is a robot, not a man. It is a mythical story about a creature that wishes to gain immortality. In the end he is what he is and nothing can change his destiny. The story may have copied from an earlier epic, of Atrahasis. Tablet I contains a creation myth about the Sumerian gods Anu, Enlil and Enki, gods of sky, wind and water, "when gods were in the ways of men" according to its incipit.

Following the casting of lots, heaven is ruled by Anu, earth by Enlil, and the freshwater sea by Enki. Enlil assigned junior gods to do farm labor and maintain the rivers and canals, but after forty years they rebelled and refused to do hard labor. Instead of punishing the rebels, Enki, who is also the kind, wise counselor to the gods, suggested that humans be created to do the work. Genesis 1:26 - Let US make man in OUR Image, in OUR likeness.." Genesis 2:5. "There was no man to work the ground!"

This is from A misinformed christain. Gilgamesh Tablet Their comment is this; "These tablets may have a reaction, or twisted version, in their accounts of the Creation and Flood."
Twisted? Hardley!

"Why do the nations conspire and the peoples plot in vain? The kings of the earth take their stand and the rulers gather together against the LORD and against his Anointed One. "Let us break their chains," they say, "and throw off their fetters." The One enthroned in heaven laughs, the Lord scoffs at them. Then he rebukes them in his anger and terrifies them in his wrath, saying, "I have installed my King on Zion, my holy hill." I will proclaim the decree of the LORD: He said to me, "you are my Son, today I have become your Father, Ask of me, and I will make the nations your inheritance, the ends of the earth your possession. You will rule them with an iron scepter; you will dash them to pieces like pottery."

Once again the word "US" appears in the text indicating Gods, More than one!. The writer again ignores this. The 'Kings of the Earth' were appointed by Enki. The Lord of Hosts is ENLIL. Enlil controls the Earth! Enlil anointed Cain or 'Sin' not Nimrod. The meaning of 'Nimrod' then is "The Rebel." Their comment; "Thus "Nimrod" may not be the character's name at all. It is more likely a derisive term of a type, a representative, of a system that is epitomized in rebellion against the Creator," the one thought to be the true God. Rebellion began soon after the Flood as civilizations were restored.... Once again indicating that the 'creator' is not the true god! Since Nimrod had the 'garments', he knew the difference.

From the texts; "Therefore, you kings, be wise; he warned, you rulers of the earth. Serve the LORD with FEAR and rejoice with trembling. Kiss the Son, lest he be angry and you be destroyed in your way, for his wrath can flare up in a moment. Blessed are all who take refuge in him."

More proof...Nimrod's name is from the verb "let us revolt." He is said to be a 'mighty hunter' (king)(gibbor tsayidh) in the sight of the Lord, but the language actually has a different meaning than what we've been taught. He becomes a tyrant or despot leading an organized rebellion against the rule of Yahweh/Enlil. He hunts not animals, but rather the souls of men.
from.. The Tower of Babel
That should clarify what we said about Yahweh/Enlil being a cruel false God.

Gilgamesh The name of YHVH rarely appears in extra-Biblical literature in the Ancient Near East. Therefore we would not expect to find it in the Gilgamesh epic. But why should the God of the Jews rarely be mentioned? The Hebrew Bible is replete with the names of other gods.

On the other hand, the nations surely knew of Him even though they had no respect for Him. If so, how might His Name appear in their literature, if at all? The name of YHVH, in a culture which is in rebellion against His rule, would most likely be in a derisive form, not in its true form. Likewise, the writers of Scripture would deride the rebels.

The Gilgamesh Epic describes the first "God is Dead" movement. In the Epic, the hero is a vile, filthy, perverted person, yet he is presented as the greatest, strongest, hero that ever lived. (Heidel 1963: 18). "So that the one who sent the Flood will not trouble them anymore, Gilgamesh sets out to kill the perpetrator." He takes with him a friend who is a monstrous half-man, half-animal -- Enkidu. Together they go on a long journey to the Cedar Mountain to find and destroy the monster who sent the Flood. Gilgamesh finds him and finally succeeds in cutting off the head of the creature whose name is "Huwawa" ("Humbaba" in the Assyrian version; see Heidel 1963: 34ff).

Is there a connection with the Gilgamesh epic and Genesis 10? Note what Gilgamesh says to Enkidu, the half-man, half-beast, who accompanied him on his journey, found in Tablet 111, lines 147 - 150.

"If I fall," Gilgamesh says, "I will establish a name for myself. 'Gilgamesh is fallen,' they will say, 'in combat with terrible Huwawa.'"

But the next five lines are missing from all tablets found so far! Can we speculate on what they say? Let's try . . . We suggest that those five lines include, "But if I win,.. they will say, Gilgamesh, the mighty vanquisher of Huwawa!"

Why do we say that? Because Genesis 10:9 gives us the portion missing from the Gilgamesh tablets. Those lines include... "it is said, Nimrod the mighty vanquisher of YHVH." This has to be what is missing from all the clay tablets of the Gilgamesh story. The Gilgamesh Epic calls him Huwawa; the Bible calls Him YHVH.

This face supposedly represents Huwawa who, according to the Gilgamesh's Epic, sent the Flood on the earth. According to the story, Huwawa (Humbaba in the Assyrian version) was killed by Gilgamesh and his half-man/half-beast friend, Enkidu. The author suggests Huwawa is the ancient pagan perspective of Yahweh (YHVH), the God of the Bible. About 3 inches (7.5 cm), this mask is dated to around the sixth century BC. Of an unknown provenance, it is now in the British Museum.

All we can conclude from them (the lost lines) is that Gilgamesh and Enkidu cut off the head of Humbaba (or Huwawa) and that the expedition had a successful issue (ending) (1963: 47).

Are the missing lines from the Epic are right there in the Bible?

This is also explained in the Nag Hammidi scrolls which church leaders want you to think are false and heretical. The tablets and the scrolls were found in two separate places, written at different times by different people so this is not a coincidence. The Dead Sea Scrolls, parts of which are still missing are also thought to contain verification of the subjects we find in these two works. A Catholic Bishop in France has them and he won't let anybody see them.... Ask yourself Why? Check out this link to the 'Missing" Dead Sea Scrolls

In the Nag Hammidi scrolls Adam describes "the god who created us" to his son Seth. And he says,"And we served him in FEAR and SLAVERY"..The only known text written by Noah is included in the texts of Enoch's Books. The text indicates a false god, who - even after the flood leads men astray. The only discernible difference in these two texts are the names of the 'Gods'. We copied parts of the Nag Hammidi text that relate to this to prove our point. You will see the connection and the links to the library on our 'Passage' series.

Tablet I continues with legends about overpopulation and plagues. Atrahasis (Noah) is mentioned at the end of Tablet I.

Tablet II begins with more overpopulation of humans and the god Enlil sending first famine and drought at formulaic intervals of 1200 years to reduce the population. In this epic Enlil is depicted as a nasty capricious god while Enki is depicted as a kind helpful god, perhaps because priests of Enki were writing and copying the story. Tablet II is mostly damaged, but ends with Enlil's decision to destroy mankind with a flood and Enki bound by an oath was to keep the plan secret.

"Let the Earthlings by hunger and pestilence perish," decreed Enlil. To speed the demise of the Earthlings, Enlil specifically ordered Enki to block Earthlings’ access to ocean fish.

Covertly, however, Enki fed Earthlings from his corn stores, trained them in sea fishing and gave them access to the sea. When Enlil accused Enki of defying his decree that humans be allowed to perish, Enki lied. He said the humans acted without his knowledge. Frustrated, Enlil planned for the final destruction of Earthlings and the end to Nibiran occupation of Earth [Sitchin, Z., 2002, The Lost Book of Enki: 206; 1978, The 12th Planet, pages 292 -294].

The sentence quoted above from Atra Hasis III iv, lines 6-7: "Like dragonflies they have filled the river, " was changed in Gilgamesh XI line 123 to: "Like the spawn of fishes, they fill the sea." We can see the myth-maker's hand at work here, changing a local river flood into an ocean deluge...but is it myth?

Each 3,600 year revolution of Nibiru to the region of Solaris created ever more violent disturbances on Nibiru, the Sun (huge solar flares) Mars (Lahmu) and Earth. Enki’s son Nergal reported from the south tip of Africa that the Antarctic ice sheet was sliding into the ocean and would, on next approach of Nibiru, slide into the sea and cause wave reverberations that would engulf most of Earth. This was from a tsunami. see Hiram Forward 1

Noahs Clock Tablet III of Atrahasis tells how the god Enki warns the hero Ziusudra, Atra Hasis or Utnapishtim (Noah) ("Extremely Wise") of Shuruppak, speaking through a reed wall (suggestive of an oracle) to dismantle his house (perhaps to provide a construction site) and build a boat to escape the flood planned by the god Enlil to destroy mankind. "He opened the water clock and filed it; the coming of the flood on the seventh night he marked off for him."
The 'Serpent' God is Galza and behind the screen to the right is Noah. Enki also tells Noah "to stop worshipping the Gods." We also see this in Genesis

Galzu tells Enki (depicted with his snake icon) to warn Ziasudra.

From Enki's Lost Books; (touching the "wall"--probably a computer bank, depicted with Xs across the screens and slots for programs) of the Flood. Galzu guides Enki’s arm to convey tablet (possibly a computer or holo disk. The disk is shown leaving Enki’s hand en route to Ziasudra’s computer) [Drawing from Sitchin, Z., 2002, The Lost Book of Enki: page 194, but interpretation mine.] Sasha Lessin, Ph. D. We note that Dr. Lessin uses the description of the Enki stories as 'fictionalized history'. That might be true if it weren't for the discovery of the Planet they came from..
see Forbidden Knowledge

13,000 years ago, around 10,900 B.C. E., "in the Whiteland, at the Earth's bottom, off its foundation, the [Antarctic] icesheet slipped. By Nibiru's netforce it was pulled into the south sea. A tidal wave arose, northward spreading."

We are taught from childhood that Faith is a positive trait, but it is not. Faith inherently assumes that we should accept something that may or may not be true. Then, it will become "true" through Faith. It will not. We may be lucky (or make a fortuitous guess) but Verification, not Faith, is what deserves our trust.

So we ask you to consider the Greeks and the Romans who each had 'different' gods. The Egyptians had 'many' gods. Then we have the people of Persia, Iran, Syria and Iraq who also had 'a different god' than the Romans and Greeks. The distinctions as we see began in Babylonia but were deleted by copists because we were threatened by a god who demands total submission only to him. But we have Abraham who "worshiped the God of his Fathers"...Abraham as we see, is important in Islam as well as Christianity. Abraham's journey began in Babylon in the city of Ur. He was told to leave by his god....Since we still find ourselves on opposite sides of a religious fence, what is the name of his god?

Important clues

From the Hebrew Torah; Genesis 1:1 BEREISHIT bara Elokim et hashamayim ve'et ha'aretz. translated - IN THE BEGINNING God created the Heavens and the earth.

Each and every mention of GOD uses the word 'Elokim'.
Versue 1:26 has the very same wording we mentioned as the most important question - Who is US? "Let US make man (men) in OUR image, as OUR likeness." Who is US?

But on the first page of the Torah we also find a god called HASHEM. Genesis 1:27 "HASHEM God then formed the man".
Genesis 2:4 Eleh toledot hashamayim veha'aretz behibare'am beyom asot HASHEM Elokim eretz veshamayim. - translated - This is the history of the heavens and the earth when they were created, on the day when "HASHEM God" made earth and heaven.

Verses 1 - 6 do not use this term 'HASHEM'. There seems to be no mistake that there is another God here who takes pity on Adam and Eve and warns Noah of the coming flood. In The Keys of Enoch - Enoch uses the term "Elohim Masters"- and "Watchers", more than one.

Then we have the verse below which uses the name 'HASHEM' only in the first part of the verse. When the word 'Elokim' appears the second time by it's self - it makes a strong case for the verification that there are two Gods.

3:1 Vehanachash hayah arum mikol chayat hasadeh asher asah HASHEM Elokim vayomer el-ha'ishah af ki-amar Elokim lo tochelu mikol etz hagan. - translated - The serpent was more cunning than any beast of the field which HASHEM God made; and it said to the woman, "Did God even say that you should not eat from all the trees of the Garden?"

The serpent here is speaking in the 3rd person. This is only in the The Jahwist text; (Two different versions of the Torah) both in the tale of Adam and Eve, and also in the episode of the Ass of Balaam, neither of which appear in the The Elohist text. The Jahwist is the only source involving talking animals.

That means this is pure fantasy ...snakes can't talk!
 Without any cognitive thought what-so-ever, we have excepted this as fact! No one has ever had the 'guts' to challange this illogical suggestion. Why, because we have trusted our church leaders not to deceive us! No where else in the bible do we find a 'talking creature' so why do we accept it here? The point is - the serpent is an ancient allegorical symbol. It is not a creature at all! Besides, 'serpent' is another word for 'Dragon' or 'wisdom' and it doesn't have anything to do with a devil or a 'Satan'. There is no such word as 'Satan' in any of the Old Testament writings. The problem lies in the 'literal' translation of texts that are hundreds if not thousands of years old. They meant something very different when they were written..

Another interesting point here is that HASHEM is asking the woman if 'Elokim' told them not to eat the fruit. He is directly referring to another god or an 'equal'.

In the Latin Vulgate bible - Genesis 3:35 we find this; "For God doth know that in what day soever you shall eat thereof, your eyes shall be opened: and you shall be as Gods, knowing good and evil"....GOD'S! King James - Genesis 3:22. "Eyes being opened" is yet another medifore for learning, knowing. This is exactly what happened. Their eyes were opened!

The oldest story in the world

The Two Gods in the Sumarian text

Although the original Sumerian text of the tale has not yet been found, a number of Sumerian depictions of the event were indeed discovered. They show different aspects of the tale: the Tree of Life; the offering of the forbidden fruit; the angry encounter that ensued between the “Lord God” and the “Serpent.” Yet another shows Eve girdled in a garment around her loins while Adam is still naked (below), another detail related in the Bible.

While the Serpent God features in all these ancient depictions, the illustration reproduced here is of particular significance as it writes out, in archaic Sumerian the god’s epithet/name as ~ The “star” spells “god” and the triangular symbol reads BUR, BURU. or BUZUR-all terms that make the epithet/name mean “God Who Solves Secrets,” “God of the Deep Mines,” and variations thereof. The Bible (in the original Hebrew) calls the god who tempted Eve Nahash, translated “Serpent,” but literally meaning “He Who Solves Secrets” and “He Who Knows Metals,” the exact parallels of the god’s name in the Sumerian depiction. This depiction is of further interest because it shows the Serpent God with his hands and feet in tethers, suggesting that ('HASHEM') was arrested after his unauthorized deed.

Humans were susposed to be slaves of the Gods. After their creation they were susposed to remain illiterate and dumb like animals. The Serpent God took it upon himself to change that and he did or you wouldn't be reading this right now!

In the background of the depiction there is another bearded and clothed deity wearing a multi-horned crown and there is a domesticated cat. 'Serpents' are being offered to Eve. This serpent is a symbol of wisdom or knowledge. What is Adam offering Eve? That's right - The Tree of Life! Apparently HASHEM was arrested before the tree could be given to Eve. The bible relates that god put flaming swords around the tree so Adam and Eve could not partake of it. The 'Tree of Life' is highly significant in the story of mankind. You will see it portrayed in all the ancient depictions of the 'Gods' including the Sumerian texts. It is also the main ingredient used in the Hebrew Kaballah. So why did god want to keep them from it? The bible states, the reason is 'that they may live forever'. This privilege was only for the Gods! This will be important as you continue.

Sumerian God But the most important thing you see here is that the 'serpent' then becomes a GOD - a supreme deity. The 'literalist' translation of the word 'serpent' therefore is incorrect and there is No satan!
Source Laurence Gardner Genesis of the Grail Kings
If you have not read the book, there are verses in the Sumerian Texts that say that Enki was Cain and Abel's Father. We show you more about Cain on forbidden f2. This proves that KA.IN isn't Adam (Adapta's) and Eve's Son.

The Nag Hammidi scrolls agree with this. They relate that Eve or Sophia could turn herself into a plant or a tree. When the rebel gods decided to defile her she escaped by turning into a tree. The fallen angels then defiled an 'image' of her. The image was known as lillith. see Origin of the World. " Now come, let us lay hold of her and cast her seed into her, so that when she becomes soiled she may not be able to ascend into her light. Rather, those whom she bears will be under our charge. But let us not tell Adam, for he is not one of us. Rather let us bring a deep sleep over him. And let us instruct him in his sleep to the effect that she came from his rib, in order that his wife may obey, and he may be lord over her." "First she was pregnant with Abel, by the first ruler. And it was by the seven authorities and their angels that she bore the other offspring".

The Enuma Elish tablets relate that Eve or NIN.HAR.SAG / Hat-Hor, (House of Horus), Isis bore 7 sets of twins. These were the 7 Races of the Earth at the time.

The texts relate; Enki's tablet asked that Anu deny Adapa immortality. Return him instead to Earth. "On Earth, Adapa (Adam) would breed a more intelligent servant race, the Adapites, the Civilized Humans, better for Nibiran needs, better able to serve the Lords than the Adamite Hybrids. The Adapites, descended from the earlier Hybrid, Adamu, had more Homo-Erectus genes than Adapa.

"In the cultic practices, humans fulfilled their destiny: to take care of the gods' material needs. They therefore provided the gods with houses (the temples) that were richly supplied with lands, which people cultivated for them.

The tablet confessed Enki'd mated with Hybrid Earthlings, Adamites, descended from Adamu and Ti-Amat. These Adamite lasses bore Adapa and Titi (Eve).

Adapa left behind the descendants of thirty sons and thirty daughters he and Titi begat. The Nibiran colonists divided these genetic descendants of Enki among themselves as proteges and taught them writing, mathematics, well-digging, body oil preparation, harp and flute mastery and the preparation of elixir of the Inbu fruits. These educated hybrids identified with their respective Nibiran teachers.

Nibirans taught Adapa's descendants to use bitumens for furnaces for gold smelting and refining.

Enlil's son, Nannar, taught the Adapite Hybrids ceremonies to worship their Nibiran lords. "Of the rites of worship of the Anunnaki [Those who from Sky Descended, i.e., Nibirans] that the beginning was."

This is the proof we were created by "God'! There was NO evolution from apes!

The other thing that stood out in this text is that Abel was supervised by Marduk in animal husbantry. KA.IN (Cain) was supervised by Enlil's son Ninurta in farming and growing grain. A jealously erupted when Cains sacriface was rejected by 'God'. The twins fought all winter until KA.IN killed Abel with a stone. "When summer began, it was not raining, the meadows were dry, the pastures dwindled. Into the fields of his brother Abael his flocks drove, from the furrows and canals to drink water. By this Ka-in was angered.
The truth about Cain and Abel

Cains punishment: "For your sin of your birthright you are deprived, but of your seed seven nations will come. In a realm set apart they shall thrive, distant lands they shall inhabit. But having your brother with a stone killed, by a stone will be your end."

Ninurta returned Ka-in to the wilds east of Edin where "in a distant realm Ka-in had sons and daughters" Ninurta, "for them a city built, and as he was building, by a falling stone was he [Ka-in] killed." (Sitchin, Z., 1985, The Wars of Gods and Men page 112] suggests this might have been a murder rather than accident.)

LAND BEYOND THE SEA: The Americas; settled by Ka-in's descendents (CAIN); overseen by Ninurtu, son of ENLIL. INCIDENTALLY, within the EARTH CHRONICLES, Sitchin makes the observation that the 'MARK OF CAIN' may well have been the genetic "decoding" of the gene for facial hair...so they could easily be recognized as a people; if you invert KA-IN...you get IN-CA or people without facial hair! cf. see Sitchin's "THE LOST REALMS" for details on Cain

So why is the Serpent God Enki literally transformed into a deity called Satan?

There is no Satan, There is No devil! Knowledge was forbidden! So if knowledge was forbidden so was knowing the 'Serpent God' Enki.
But there is a deity that considers himself the judge of humankind- Enlil. We mentioned the newly published Gospel of Judas on the previous page. We said there was a sentence that was significant. quote; The disciples were saying a prayer of thanksgiving and Jesus laughed at them. That sentence spoken by Jesus being; " He answered and said to them, I am not laughing at you. You are not doing this because of your own will but because it is through this that your god will be praised." unquote "Your god"? There can be no clearer verification that there are two Gods!

The sinister satanic figure (sometimes called Lucifer, Beelzebub or Belial-meaning ‘worthless’) emerged mainly through the onset of Christian Dualism- the concept of two opposing and equally powerful gods.’ According to different traditions, Satan was either the brother or the son of Jehovah, or was even the competitive and aggressive aspect of Jehovah himself, in essence, the Jehovah-Satan conflict was representative of the ancient pre-Christian tradition of the symbolic battle between Light and Darkness as perceived by the Persian mystics. This tradition found its way into the ascetic Judaism of sects such as the Essenes of Qumrân, and it is to some extent recognizable in the New Testament, but it was not apparent in the Hebrew lore of the Old Testament wherein satans or demons are seen to perform specific duties of mundane opposition.

So, from what original concept or Bible entry was the modern Christian image of Satan born? In the Old Testament book of Isaiah is a section dealing with the prophesied fall of Babylon, and in referring to the city and its despotic king, Isaiah says, ‘How are you fallen from heaven, day star, son of the dawn! How are you fallen to earth, conqueror of nations!’ (Isaiah 14:12). Many centuries after this was written, the image of the fallen day star (Venus) was redefined as ‘light-bearer’, and when translated into Latin with a proper noun connotation it became Lucifer. Hence, Lucifer appeared in this Venus context in St. Jerome’s 4th-century Vulgate Bible, to become associated with an evil Satan some 1400 years later in John Milton’s Paradise Lost:
Of Lucifer, so by allusion called,
Of that bright star to Satan paragon’d.

Today, the Isaiah verse in authorized Christian Bibles retains the Latinized entry which emanated from the Christian Church's creation of its own Satan mythology during Roman Imperial times. The Roman faith was based wholly on subjugating people at large to the domination of the bishops, and to facilitate this subordination an anti-God/anti-Christ figure was necessary as a perceived enemy. This enemy was Satan, the evil one who would claim the souls of any who did not offer absolute obedience to the Church.

For this scheme of trepidation to succeed, it was imperative for people to believe that the diabolical Satan had existed from the beginning time, and there was no earlier story with which he could be associated than that of Adam and Eve. The only problem was that Genesis made no mention whatever of Satan-but there was, of course, the inherent account of Eve and the wise serpent. The Serpent Lord was Enki, but in parts of Chaldea he had been called Shaitan, and so it was determined that the story could be rewritten to suit the desired purpose. The original text was, after a Jewish version and Christianity had become quite divorced from Judaism, even from the Westernized Judaism of Jesus.

In those days there was no understandable translation of the Bible available to Christians at large. The Jews had their Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek versions of the Old Testament, while the primary Christian Bible existed in an obscure form of Church Latin, as translated by St. Jerome in the 4th century. Outside the immediate Roman Church of the West, there were enthusiastic Eastern Christian branches in places such as Syria, Egypt and Ethiopia, and it was mainly from these regions (where the Jewish Competition was stronger) that the new Genesis accounts emerged for the Christian market.

Among these was an Egyptian and Ethiopic work called The Book of Adam and Eve, subtitled The Conflict of Adam and Eve with Satan, which was produced sometime in or after the 6th century AD. This lengthy book not only features Satan as a central character, but even goes so far as to say that the cross of Jesus was erected on the very spot where Adam was buried!

A Syriac work entitled The Book of the Cave of Treasures (M’drath gaze’) is a compendium of earthly history from the creation of the World to the crucifixion of Jesus. It appears to have been compiled in the 4th century AD, but the oldest extant edition comes from the late 6th century. Once again, this book introduces Satan as the constant protagonist of evil, setting the scene for the dark and sinister element that flourishes in the Church-promoted Gothic tradition that evolved during the brutal Catholic inquisition. The book even maintains that orthodox Christinity was in place before the time of Adam and Eve and the emergent Hebrews.
Laurence Gardner Genesis of the Grail Kings

The Sumerian version relates that in his anger Enlil (Elokim) (the God in Genesis) ordered the expulsion of The Adam - the Homo sapiens - Earthling - from the E.DIN (“The Abode of the Righteous Ones”). No longer confined to the settlements of the Anunnaki, (the gods) Man began to roam the Earth.

So why was the unauthorized deed considered evil? - We think you know. Enlil did not want humans to be literiate because that made them equals.

Something else here should now be quite clear - The serpent is not Satan, but is a God that loves humans and wants to protect them. How do we know this?
Because the Serpent God Enki did not lie to Eve! He did not trick her! The verse says, "The eyes of both of them were opened", a medifore for 'knowing', learning, self realization (Genesis 3:7). They became "One of US!"...and they did NOT DIE as threatened by the 'one' god (Enlil) in Genesis.

In the Judeo-Christian and Islamic traditions, the parents of the human race, Genesis gives two versions of their creation. In the first, God creates "male and female in his own image" on the sixth day. In the second, Adam is placed in the Garden of Eden, and Eve is later created from his rib to ease his loneliness. One of these versions is incorrect. Can you tell which one it is? The correct version is revealed in the Nag Hammidi texts.

The kind, loving God in the Sumerian text, Enki wants humans to be like the gods. His first and most important deed was 'giving them knowledge'. But who took the credit for the creation of mankind? - Obviously the second god mentioned in the Hebrew Genesis because God makes a man in Genesis 1:27...so why does God make him again in Genesis 2:7? - "breathing the breath of life into it."... and note the first mentioned verse refers to "US" (1:26) So who is 'US'? - Now You Know!...However only the God in verse 2:7 had the ability or knowledge to 'breath life' into Adam. Another distinction is that verse 1:27 uses the term 'Lord God'..the verse 2:7 only uses the word God. The 'Lord' god gives the warning not to eat the fruit. Remember 'Lord' means 'owner'. see Psalm 82 above - "You too are gods, sons of El Elyon, all of you".

The Nag Hammidi texts have a similar explaination: The un-named, un-seen Creator invisions a mate and She appears. She then is also His daughter because She is created first. This creation is from the emotions of love, kindness, joy, forgiveness and all the beauty of the creative force. Sophia is the only one who can see her Father. In the texts a Son is born to Sophia and the Un-named creator 'from a spark of light that resembles blessedness'. This Son is the only one created of "Pure Light". Sophia then has a daughter. Her name is Eve or Zoe. In her myriad of emotions, Sophia desires to understand and know her Father. In Her desire to know Him, her extreme emotions produce a demiruge (another son). The demiruge is an imperfect copy of the creator; a product of fear and grief. This deity embodies all other negative emotions including hate and jealousy. Because he is imperfect, he cannot see the un-named Father and he is jealous of the Son of Pure Light.

In his egotistical attempt to prove he is the only God, he creates three Adams, but none of them have 'life'. Sophia intervenes and breathes life into one of the Adams (which means 'man'). Sophia then sends Eve to teach him about the un-named Father. As you might guess, Yaldabaoth (the demiruge) is jealous of and hates the 'man'. Yalabaoth is a 'material' deity. He controls what can be seen and touched including men. He alone is the creator of 'death'.

The Son of 'Pure Light' is the Christ and he makes it possible from the beginning that humans have eternal life...taken from The Apocryphon of John in the Nag Hammidi library. This then translates to "The Tree of Life" from which we are all given "Eternal Life" by the Son!
More of this is on our 'God's Wife' page and a secret page where we explain what our soul really is...A gift from God.

In the Sumerian texts; "Thereafter the Primitive Workers performed the manual tasks in both Lands: In the Land of the Mines they "bore the work and suffered the toil"; in Mesopotamia, "with picks and spades they built gods' houses, they built the big canal banks; food they grew for the sustenance of the gods." Many ancient drawings engraved on cylinder seals depicted these Primitive Workers performing their tasks, naked as the animals of the field." Various Sumerian texts recorded this animal-like stage in human development. As we see there are two Gods seated here.


Forbiddenk1 reveals the very first primitive workers as does this web site...They were not human and the DNA does not match.
Ancient Skull

What the Bible is hidding, right before your eyes.

We continue our focus here on the verse in Genesis beginning at 2:16-17, which we have already touched on above. We invite you to get out your King James bible and read along.

"And God said, You may not eat from the tree of Knowledge or Conscious - for its fruit will open your eyes to make you aware of right and wrong, good and bad.
If you eat its fruit, you will die."
The Living Bible - 1971

Why was eating from the tree of knowledge considered bad
and why was an interpretation made that God would kill Adam and Eve for eating of it?
What is Conscious?

There was no real reason for this idle threat. And it is just that - A THREAT!....Nothing in the bible says that the tree of knowledge was bad! Nothing in the bible says that God will kill them! God just said, 'Don't eat of it'!.. but why?...

The ultimate reason was that the church did not want anyone to be educated because they would discover the church's secret. Keeping men and women ignorant kept them under control just as Enlil wanted complete control of the 'Earthlings'.

Keep reading .... We find that NO ONE died!
Get your bible out, read it again. Adam and Eve did NOT DIE!

As we read in Genesis 3: 4 - 5, as positive reinforcement, the serpent says, .. "You will NOT surely die!" "For God knows that when you eat of it your eyes will be opened and you will be like God, knowing good and evil".
Apparently this was true.... because No One died!
Genesis 3:7 "Then the eyes of both of them were opened".

Man is the only creature in the vast universe who asks questions and, with a sirit of inquiry, wants to know. He is a questing as well as questioning spirit, and like Ulysses of old: "strong in will to strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield". Inquiry and curiosity are the great dynamics of all research and discovery.
"What endless questions vex the thought of Whence, and Whither, When and How?"

So the only 'projected evil' or so-called sin, is a clergyman's interpertation of the verse you just read, because God did NOT kill Adam or Eve!

The serpent, blamed for the temptation of Eve is not a serpent at all. Again the 'serpent' is a medifore, a symbol. It is NOT SATAN! Where do you see the word 'Satan?'..

Temptation? Origional sin? Hardley! Genesis 3:5 - The verse spoken by the serpent becomes an actual fact. You could say, he spoke the truth because their eyes were opened and they did not die.
Therefore, the Serpent did not deceive Eve, he did not 'trick her', he told the truth.

"US" This is not a 'typo'. It is not a mistake in printing. It says, "US"! Genesis 1:26 and 3:22.

'US!' are sons of the God we see in the first part of Genesis but the leader of 'US' is also called Elohm, El, and Enlil. His cohorts are called Watchers and guardians!

It is "US" .... Several Gods! Actually 200 of them.
There are back up verses in the Bible to verify this as we mentioned Genesis 11:7 and Daniel 4:17.
There's another one in the time of Noah where they are called the Nephilim, and these are the children of the band of so-called 'fallen angels'. They are called the "sons" of God in Genesis 6:4. "The sons of God went to the daughters of men and had children by them." They are described as the reason God brings a flood to destroy mankind....but that isn't the whole story!

If you recall, the true God has only ONE SON! In the Nag Hammidi texts his name is Seth. From the christian prospective, He is Adam's third son, but Genesis verses reveal Seth is from Adam's own flesh and blood, whereas Cain and Abel are not. From a pre-christian viewpoint - This is when God first put the spirit of Christ in a man. Similarly in Egypt this God/man is called Thoth. He is the first born son of Enki, called Ningishzidda in the Sumerian texts. Ningishzidda next created a female zygote to clone from his mother NINKI. He called her Eve, a sandy-blonde caucasian female. In the Sumerian tongue her name is Ti.AMAT, Mother of life.

Our page called 'Passage Secrets forward' explains in more detail, who 'US' is. The leader of 'US' demanded that he be called god. He demanded obedience and he struck fear into the hearts of man. He is not a god of love and forgivness.

On our Widow's Son page we refered to a verse that has significant revelance to this distinction between the gods. We repeat it again here. It is also echoed in this verse - "Get up and flee to Egypt with the baby and stay there until I tell you to return." Matthew 2:13. This indicates a 'protector' god, the one Marcion describes as the God of Jesus and his family.

Hosea 11:1; "When Israel was a child...“Out of Egypt did I call my son.”
Hosea 2:16 indicates that the Hebrews worshiped Baal or 'a master' god. They sacrificed to Baal and burned incense to idols." The rest of this chapter is important.

Hosea 11:9; "I am God and not man; I am the Holy One living amoung you, and I did not come to destroy."

Verse 11:12; "Israel (Jacob) surrounds me with lies and deceit..but Judah still trusts in God and is faithfil to the Holy One." The Living Bible, page 696.

In verse 12:3 - 5 Judah is wrestling with god. He meets the Lord god at Bethel, 'the Lord of Hosts' Jehovah is his name. Judah is the son of Jacob who suggested the brothers sell Joseph to the Ishmaelites. Why is Judah favored here over Israel (Jacob)?

Here is why - Hosea 13, "Israel worships Baal." Also take note that this God emphasizes he is Not here to Destroy! So do we have two gods again here? Is Judah wrestling with Enlil? More about Israel's God Seth or Baal is on Widow's Son 1, automatic scroll down.

Does anyone remember what Albert Pike said? He said the true God was the serpent! Since we have shown that distinction and what it means - the true God is Knowledge! If you have knowledge you are a part of God himself! Or as the serpent says, you will be like God!

So what really happened in the Garden of Eden?

In the biblical tale of Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden, the antagonist of the Lord or 'owner' God who had caused them to acquire “knowing” (the ability to procreate) was the Serpent, 'Nahash' in Hebrew.

"In old Europe, the snake represented the power in the earth that supports life and the transformation of life on its surface. The snake was recognized as the actual force behind the creation..."
- An Encyclopedia of Archetypal Symbolism

"Everywhere the snake or the spiral appears in the presence of new life: Vases flaunt a gigantic snake winding over the whole universe, or over the sun, moon, and stars; elsewhere the snake appears below a growing plant or coils above the belly of a pregnant woman....The snake was a symbol of energy - spontaneous, creative energy - and of immortality."

The snake was actually the Christ spirit, who tried to free Adam and Eve from their own ignorance by making them eat of the Tree of Knowledge. Their ascent from ignorance is reflected by them opening their eyes and seeing their nakedness (they are not clothed with knowledge, or wisdom). This angers the Demiruge, who casts them out in case they eat of the Tree of Life, which would grant them immortality which, together with the Tree of Knowledge, would make them as gods. It is through envy that we were banished. Those of you who have read Nietzche's text on christianity (affectionately entitled 'Antichrist') will know the consequences of the banishment: toil, struggle and suffering to keep us from discovering the truth.

Michelangelo's Brazen Serpent “...the Spirit, speaking to the heart of Moses, [tells him] to make a representation of the cross and of him who was to suffer upon it... Moses therefore made a graven serpent.”
This is very bizarre indeed. Not only do we have God represented as a serpent, but Christ as well. And it gets more interesting still. In the cabalistic science known as “gematria” (in which words are reduced to numbers), words sharing the same numeric value are viewed as having an identical essence on a higher level of meaning. In gematria, the words “messiah” and “serpent” can both be reduced to the same number: 358. So in cabalistic terms, the messiah and the serpent are one and the same.

From Zecharia Sitchen's Genesis Revisited
The triangular symbol which reads BUR, BURU or BUZUR: The term has two other meanings: “he who knows secrets” and “he who knows copper.” These other meanings or word plays are found in the Sumerian epithet BUZUR for Enki, which meant “he who solves secrets” and “he of the metal mines.” I have therefore suggested in previous writings that, in the original Sumerian version, the “Serpent” was Enki. His emblem was entwined serpents; it was the symbol of his “cult center” Eridu (a), of his African domains in general (b), and of the pyramids in particular (C); and it appeared on Sumerian illustrations on cylinder seals of the events described in the Bible.

What did the emblem of entwined serpents-the symbol for medicine and healing to this very day-represent? The discovery by modem science of the double-helix structure of DNA offers the answer: the Entwined Serpents emulated the structure of the genetic code, the secret knowledge of which enabled Enki to create the Adam and then grant Adam and Eve the ability to procreate.

A Limoges enamelled plaque of the twelfth century (in the collection of Mr. Octavius Morgan) represents on its one half "Moyses" lifting up the Brazen Serpent to the "Filii Israel." On the other half, "similis Aaron" is seen inscribing with a reed pen the mystic Tau Cross upon the foreheads of the elect. The first of these tableaux offers the most extraordinary feature in its representation of the serpent, depicted here with lion's head and mane: the veritable Agathodæmon Chnuphis of our Alexandrian talismans.

Tammuz, like Christ, was associated with fishing and shepherding. The Tau cross takes the shape of the letter of his name, and is one of the oldest letters known. A solar god, the death and resurrection of Tammuz were celebrated every spring. The custom of marking the forehead with a cross of ashes dates back to these rituals. The tau cross is often used as a variant of the Latin, or Christian cross.

The well-informed and temperate Hippolytus, writing at the most flourishing period of these transitional theosophies, thus opens his actual 'Refutation of all Heresies' and his Fifth Book with the description "of that sect which hath dared to boast the Serpent as the author of their religion, as they prove by certain arguments wherewith he hath inspired them. On this account the apostles and priests of this creed have been styled 'Naaseni,' from 'Naas,' the Hebrew word for serpent: but subsequently they entitled themselves 'The Gnostics,' because they alone understood the deep things of religion.
see.. THE CHNUPHIS SERPENT

The emblem of Enki as a sign of healing was invoked by Moses when he made a nahash ne/ios/zeth-a “copper serpent" - to halt an epidemic afflicting the Israelites. Was the involvement of copper in the triple meanings of the term and in the making of the copper serpent by Moses due to some unknown role of copper in genetics and healing? Zecharia Sitchen - Genesis Revisited

Ever since George Smith found and reported in 1876 (The Chaldean Account of Genesis) detailed Mesopotamian tales of Creation, followed by L. W. King’s The Seven Tablets of Creation, scholars and theologians alike have come to recognize that the Creation Tales of the Old Testamant (Genesis Chapters 1 through 3) are condensed and edited versions of original Sumerian texts. A century later, in our work, The 12th Planet (Sitchen 1976), we have shown that these texts were no primitive myths, but depositories of advanced scientific knowledge with which modern scholars are only now beginning to catch up.
Zacharia Sitchen -The Wars of Gods and Men, pg 29-31

In the Sumerian texts we also find this;
When Mankind was first created,
They knew not the eating of bread,
Knew not the dressing of garments,
Ate plants with their mouth like sheep,
Drank water from the ditch

"The Torah - continued

Genesis 3:21 - Vaya'as HASHEM Elokim le-Adam ule-ishto kotnot or vayalbishem. translated - HASHEM God made for Adam and his wife garments of skin and He clothed them. A page later in the story of Noah's flood, 8 - VeNoach matza chen be'einei HASHEM...translated -
But Noach found favor in the eyes of HASHEM.

Elohim is first used in Gen 1:1. Elohim is translated as "God." The derivation of the name Elohim is debatable to most scholars. Some believe it derived from 'êl which, in turn, originates from the root word, 'wl (which means "strong"). Others think that Elohim is derived from another two roots: 'lh (which means "god"). And still others presume that both 'êl and Elohim come from 'eloah. In the Old Testament Elohim occurs over 2000 times (God, Judge, Creator) in conjunction with 'elôah ( which means "fear".) The standard Greek word for god, "a transcendent being who exercises extraordinary control in human affairs or is responsible for bestowal of unusual benefits" (BDAG). It specifically refers to the monotheistic (one) God of Israel.

Then we have names like; El Elyon which occurs 28 times. It occurs 19 times in Psalms. El Elyon is first used in Gen 14:18. El is another name that is translated as "God" and can be used in conjunction with other words to designate various aspects of God's character. Elyon literally means "Most High" and is used both adjectivally and substantially throughout the Old Testament. It expresses the extreme sovereignty and majesty of God and His highest preeminence. When the two words are combined - El Elyon - it can be translated as "the most exalted God."(Psa 57:2) In Enoch's books we find a god called 'The Most High'.

El Shaddai occurs 7 times. El Shaddai is first used in Gen 17:1. The name is derived from an Akkadian word Šadu, meaning "mountain," suggesting strength and power). This refers to a God that is completely nourishing, satisfying, and supplying His people with all their needs as a mother would her child. Connected with the word for God, El, this denotes a God who freely gives nourishment and blessing, He is our sustainer. Further references of the name El Shaddai in the Old Testament: Gen 17:1; Gen 28:3; Gen 35:11; Gen 43:14; Gen 48:3. El Shaddai is the God that Moses spoke to on the mountain.. ('God of the Mountain')

Adonai occurs 434 times. There are heavy uses of Adonai in Isaiah (e.g., Adonai Jehovah). It occurs 200 times in Ezekiel alone. We also saw it in Enoch's secret books. To avoid contravening the commandment "Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain" (Exd 20:7), sometimes Adonai was used as a substitute for Yahweh (YHWH). Adonai can be translated literally as, "my lords' " (both plural and possessive) in Daniel Chapter 9. Adonai is first used in Gen 15:2. Adonai is the verbal parallel to Yahweh and Jehovah. Adonai is plural; the singular is adon. In reference to God the plural Adonai is used. When the singular adon is used, it usually refers to a human lord. This specifically relates to Christ on Earth. Adon is used 215 times to refer to men. Occasionally in Scripture and predominantly in the Psalms, the singular adon is used to refer to God as well (cf. Exd 34:23).

The christian bible was translated from the Torah but it fails to recognize that there were two gods calling the One God "Lord", Jehovah and Yehwah. 'Lord' meant 'owner'. But there are other words we would like you to consider - Elohim (mentioned above), Nephilim and most importantly the word ' Watcher' which we see in Daniel 4:17. To guote this verse; "For this has been decreed by the Watchers, demanded by the Holy Ones (more than one). The purpose of this decree is that all the world may understand that the Most High dominates the kingdoms of the world and gives them to anyone he wants to, even the lowest of men!".

These words or descriptions of the gods are in the King James Bible and we would like to explain where each of these names came from. "The Sons of God" who went to the daughters of men - are more than One! Genesis 6. The daughters of men are actually the daughters of Cain.

When we began this investigation, we thought we had one god with a different name depending on which area or country you were in. In actuality we have several gods...each controlling his or her own territory. This is confirmed by the plural translation of each of the words for god we see here. Enoch also speaks of "Watchers" - more than one. In Egypt all the gods were considered and in one text they are also called "Watchers".

The Egyptian Book of the Dead has this verse; 'Deliver thou the scribe Nebseni, whose word is truth, from the Watchers, who carry murderous knives, who possess cruel fingers, and who would slay those who are in the following of Osiris.'
May these Watchers never gain the mastery over me, and may I never fall under their knives!'

The most important division - as you will see, is the division between the Hebrew God and the Gods of the Egyptians but they too started in the very same place, just a few miles from each other. Abraham was from Ur in Mesopotamia or the land of Sumer, the oldest known civilization in the world. We assume that Eden was located in 'the land between two rivers' which is now in Iraq, but that whole area was called Babylonian (Map) at one time. Take a look at the map and remember the name Eridu - found in the lower portion of the map near the Persian gulf. Also we see that Ur is only a few miles from Eridu.

The Garden of Eden was located in the land of Eridu. It is now the modern city of Abu Sharain, about 16 miles south-west of Ur in the Eupharates delta. The unearthed temple-remains of the Eridu ziggurat date from 2100 BC, but beneath these remains have been found seventeen more temples, each built one above the other and dating back to proto-historic times.

The rivers of Eden were actually located in the land of Cush. A re-translation of Genesis 2:10-14 shows the exact location. "A river rises in Eden to water the garden; before that it consists of four separate branches. The name of the first branch Pishon; it is the one that winds through the whole land of the Havilah people, where there is gold... The name of the second river is Gihon; it is the one that winds through all the land of Kush (Al'Uhaimir). The name of the third river is Tigris; it is the one that flows eastward of Ashur. The fourth river is the Euphrates."
Laurence Gardner Genesis of the Grail Kings

The course of the Euphrates River has constantly changed channels in its lower portion. Today the Euphrates flows west of where it did in the third to second millennium B.C. At this time the lower Euphrates (then called by the Sumerians "Purattu") flowed from the ancient city of Sippar, to Kish, to Nippur, to Shurrupak (supposedly Noah's home town), to Uruk, to Ur, and then into the Persian Gulf .

In summary, geological and biblical evidence suggests that the four rivers of Eden from west to east were the Pishon (Wadi al Batin), the Euphrates, the Hiddekel (Tigris), and the Gihon (the Karun and/or the Karkheh). And while the identification of the Pishon and Gihon Rivers must still be considered as somewhat tentative, the certain identification of the Tigris and Euphrates leaves no doubt as to the approximate location of the Garden of Eden. These rivers locate the Garden of Eden as on a modern landscape at the head of the Persian Gulf-- but not the present-day head of the Persian Gulf. More on the geological evidence that the Garden was near Eridu. We also find Noah's Sumerian name - Ziusudra. Garden of Eden.

"Throughout Mesopotamia, from the earliest times of Sumer and Akkad, all lands were owned by gods and men were their slaves. Of this, the cuneiform Sumerian texts leave no doubt whatever. Each city-state had its own principal god, and the king was described in the very earliest written documents that we have as 'the tenant farmer of the god'. "
- Julian Jaynes, The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind

We have a detailed 'King' list on another page which is part of the 26 B.C. anti-divilian King list. These kings ruled before 'recorded history' began. Time is measured in 'sars', which are equal to one Earth year or a revolution of the 365 days it takes to travel around the Sun.. A saroi is one revolution of the planet Nibiru (3600 years) around the Sun. We will show you what we know about this planet on the 3rd page of this series. "After the kingship descended from heaven, the kingship was in Eridug. In Eridug, Alulim became king; he ruled for 28800 Earth years."

Sumerian King List
1 - Eridu A-lulim 28.800 years = 8 saroi
2 - Eridu Alalgar 36.000 years = 10 saroi
3 - Bad-tibira En-men-lu-Anna 43.200 years = 12 saroi
4 - Bad-tibira En-men-gal-Anna 28.800 years = 8 saroi
5 - Bad-tibira Dumu-zi 36.000 years = 10 saroi
6 - Larak En-sipa-zi-Anna 28.800 years = 8 saroi
7 - Sippar En-men-dur-Anna 21.000 years = 5,833 saroi
8 - Shuruppak Ubar-Tutu 18.600 years = 5,166 saroi

This list is also found here.. THE SUMERIAN SONS OF GOD. This list of kings is based on Weld-Blundell, W-B. 62. from Larsa. The respective columns "House", "Star Realm" and ° of 360° were added to the original list and are discoveries by Andis Kaulins.

The First Column of the Turin Papyrus (using Gardiner's columniation) we find to be a list of the heavenly bodies in the following order: The Universe, The Sun, Mercury, Venus, The Moon, Mars, Jupiter and Saturn. The planets are given in the correct order on the Turin Papyrus. These heavenly bodies comprised a heavenly family as in the ancient Baltic pantheon (more than one).

For an explanation of Column I of the Turin Papyrus go to the Turin Papyrus , this is Transcription I. You will find on this list the names of the 'Gods' which are written matching the Sumerian names for the planets. A planet was also known as a 'Star" which, as we have seen above means God. So right away we have 8 Gods. More is explained on 'Passage Forward'.

Continued on Forbidden forward 2




Forbidden Forward Forbidden K1
Forbidden forward 2 Forbidden 2
Forbidden 3 Forbidden 4
Forbidden 5 Forbidden 6
Forbidden Knowledge The Enuma Elish
Site Map Page The Master Pythagoras
back to The Widow's Son Death of the disciples - forward
Death of the disciples Atlantis, The Creation of Adam
The Ark of the Covenant Atlantis, Page 2 - Plato's account
" The Secret of the Pyramid of Gaza" The False Church
Passage Forward Passage Forward 2
God's Wife Passage of Secrets 1
Abraham

Hiram - Forward Hiram - Forward 1
Hiram - Forward 2 Hiram Index 1
Hiram Index 2 Hiram Index 3
Hiram Index 4 Hiram Index 5
Hiram Index 6 Hiram Introduction ...
Hiram Introduction 1 Hiram Introduction 1 continued
Hiram Introduction 2 Hiram Introduction 3
Hiram Introduction 5 Hiram Introduction 6



We lost our previous guest book with no warning. Please sign this one.

Guestbook


Back to Hiram discovered

Search this site


powered by FreeFind

Our search Engine does not search for the links in this site, only words in the text.

NO PART OF THIS SITE MAY BE COPIED OR REPRODUCED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE WEBMASTER. c COPYRIGHT 1999 - 2012 C.I.C...ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.


"Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds" -- Albert Einstein