The Arian controversy was a Christological dispute that began in Alexandria between the followers of Arius (the Arians) and the followers of St. Alexander of Alexandria (now known as Homoousians). The word homoousia, in particular, was initially disliked by many bishops because of its associations with Gnostic heretics (who used it in their theology), and because it had been condemned at the 264–268 Synods of Antioch.

Basically, they were saying that Jesus was God, and God's son, not a creation of God. This is considered one of the mysteries of the catholic church. Finally, he is said to be "from the substance of the Father," in direct opposition to Arianism.

Ultimately there were great differences and disagreements amoung the bishops of the era and they made their opionions known. Outside of Rome the Bishops wrote their own versions of scripture. But in Rome, the Apostles' Creed was popular, especially for use in Lent and the Easter season. In the Council of Nicaea, one specific creed was used to define the Church's faith clearly, to include those who professed it, and to exclude those who did not. Great leaders such as Eustathius of Antioch, Alexander of Alexandria, Athanasius, and Marcellus of Ancyra all adhered to the Homoousian position.

The works of Arius were ordered to be confiscated and consigned to the flames while all persons found possessing them were to be executed. Nevertheless, the controversy, already festering, continued in various parts of the empire. As a result, anyone who disagreed was excommunicated and in some cases exiled. more controversy-see the above link.

Eusebius' Ecclesiastical History which mentions the Apocalypse of John; the Epistle of James, and the Apocalypse of Peter, (Now part of the Nag Hammidi collection) gives us access to a host of sources and traditions otherwise long since lost. Deemed heretical and forgeries of heretics by the early church; .... such books as the Gospels of Peter, of Thomas, of Matthias, and the Acts of Andrew and John or even of some others besides these including the other apostles represented the true gospel taught by Jesus. The 'Father of Church History' had at his disposal the library at Caesarea which Origen had built up after he had been forced to leave Alexandria and take up residence in Palestine.

Apart from the writings of these men, other texts of the era indicate how the liberal minstry of Jesus was already being reconstructed to become thoroughly dogmatic and separatist. From there Judasim was declared 'unholy' and circumcision was the 'work of the devil'. Most of us are aware of what happened next. People who lived under Roman rule were not allowed to have their own opinion about religious matters. Only the Pope had complete control over what anyone was allowed to believe. They went on to pronounce that only the high clergy had the right to speek to God, forgive sins, ect.

Consult this page if you doubt us! Paul deceives many

Paul's so-called vision:
Peter has much to say in reply to this, but the passage which mainly concerns us is as follows:

"But can any one be educated for teaching by vision? And if you shall say, "It is possible," why did the Teacher remain and converse with waking men for a whole year? And how can we believe you even as to the fact that he appeared to you? And how can he have appeared to you seeing that your sentiments are opposed to his teaching? But if you were seen and taught by him for a single hour, and so became an apostle, then preach his words, expound his meaning, love his apostles, fight not with me who had converse with him. For it is against a solid rock, the foundation-stone of the Church, that you have opposed yourself in opposing me. If you were not an adversary, you would not be slandering me and reviling the preaching that is given through me, in order that, as I heard myself in person from the Lord, when I speak I may not be believed, as though forsooth it were I who was condemned and I who was reprobate. Or, if you call me condemned, you are accusing God who revealed the Christ to me, and are inveighing against Him who called me blessed on the ground of the revelation. But if indeed you truly wish to work along with the truth, learn first from us what we learnt from Him, and when you have become a disciple of truth, become our fellow-workman. from Simon Magus

Here we have the advantage, rare in ecclesiastical history, of hearing the other side. The above is unmistakably the voice of those early Christians who hated Paul, or at all events an echo of that voice. But how late an echo it would be hazardous to decide. There are other features in the portrait which remind us strongly of Marcion. For the first thing which we learn from the Homilies about Simon's opinions is that he denied that God was just. By "God" he meant the Creator. But he undertakes to prove from Scripture that there is a higher God, who really possesses the perfections which are falsely ascribed to the lower.
On these grounds Peter complains that, when he was setting out for the Gentiles to convert them from their worship of many gods upon earth, the Evil Power had sent Simon before him to make them believe that there were many gods in heaven.

People were incensed by Paul's chameleon behavior -- in II Cor 12:16 he responds to charges of "taking people in by deceit" -- and rightfully so. While it's perfectly acceptable to lie and deceive in the honor-shame Mediterranean (on which we see here), especially against enemies, it's not acceptable to beguile one's potential converts like this. Given locates the rationale for Paul's deception in an apocalyptic world-view: because he believed people were so blinded by the heathen gods of the present world -- and too easily taken in by pagan deceptions -- they needed to be deceived in turn for their own good. (see pp 115-117). Paul's strategy, in this sense, mimics those of Socrates and Aristotle:

"Just as Plato's Socrates feels free to break the rules of dialectic if necessary in order to win an argument, and Aristotle can counsel the use of sophistic elenchus to defeat sophists on their own terms, so Paul feels free to leave the world of being for that of seeming, 'to become all things to everyone,' in order to propagate the truth, his gospel truth... In a Platonic-Socratic world-view, the ignorance from which humanity suffers results from the elusive and changing nature of the sphere of becoming, but in Paul's apocalyptic worldview, the deceptive character of existence in 'this world' is even more acute because 'the god of this world' is himself a diabolically clever sophist... [In either case], the deceived must first be deceived for their own good." (pp 117, 176-177, 117)

Most Masonic legend has connections with the Secret books of Enoch, Noah, Nimrod, the Laws of Moses, and Solomon, who were not Jewish, Christian, Catholic, Hindu, Buddhist or Mussleum.

First, some necessary background information must be given. There was an ancient Jewish religion which was very mystical, high and noble. It was a very evolved form of religion, rooted in respect and care for all of creation. This ancient Jewish religion was both very esoteric -- as evidenced by its Kabalah mysticism -- and yet very practical, as evidenced by its emphasis on daily lifestyle disciplines, ecology and communal economics. It was also VERY VEGETARIAN: not only was animal sacrifice forbidden, but so was the eating of animal flesh absolutely condemned. War and slavery had no part in this nonviolent religion. Women were the equals to men; women were entitled -- in fact, encouraged-- to participate in the Priesthood. This Priesthood -- called "The Priesthood of Melki Zadek" -- was governed by God via good angels and the divinely inspired BOOK OF THE ETERNAL COVENANT. Their original founder was Enoch; later, Moses led a major remanifestation of their movement. THIS ENLIGHTENED ANCIENT JEWISH RELIGION WAS KNOWN AS "ESSENE NAZARENE JUDAISM".
see Authentic Judaism established by God through Enoch and Moses

You didn't know about this? See what was left out of the Bible?

Background; Also known as Zoroastrianism (from Zoroaster, a Hellenization of Zarathustra). A Persian religion which was founded by the prophet Zarathustra, who may have been an Agrarian living ca. 628 - 551 BCE. Zarathustra rejected the polytheism of contemporary Persian religion in favor of a strict dualism between the principle of absolute good, Ahura Mazdah (whose name was later contracted to Ormazd or Ormuzd) and the principle of absolute evil, Ahriman. The two opposing principles conducted a cosmic battle for souls, personified by their aspects Spenta Mainya and Angra Mainya, the Holy Spirit and the Destructive Spirit. Although Zarathustrianism was strictly monotheistic (one God ) in worship, it incorporated a host of angelic attendents, most or all of whom were originally pagan deities in the Persian pantheon, each serving one or the other Principle.

This, then, is religious milieu into which Jesus, a Galilean religious reformer, appeared during his projected lifespan of ca. 7 BCE to ca. 48 CE. His religion incorporated many Zarathustrian elements from both contemporary Judaism and from Hellenistic thought. He incorporated the Zarathustrian-inspired doctrine of the coming "Dominion of God" as the core of his teachings. He may have also received significant influence from the desert-based apocalyptic reformer, John the Baptist. His second generation of followers extended this trend.

The so-called NT Gospels were written in a 'coded' language to pass on political information to the real followers of Christ. This code was not understood by the Romans. An example of the code language is explained on The Real Jesus .

We urge you to read what the code words mean and then re-read the Gospels.. You will see a different story emerge than the literalist conclusions of Paul. In the beginning Paul's work was closely associated with gnosis, except for one important factor. Who their god was.
Here is an example;
The Apostle Paul explained that the tabernacle pointed to our physical bodies. “What? know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost which is in you, which ye have of Elohim (God). Note; Elohim - FALSE GOD , and ye are not your own? For ye are bought with a price: therefore glorify Elohim (God) in your body, and in your spirit, which are Elohim’s. I Cor. 6:19-20; Jn 2:18-21).” So clearly the purpose of the tabernacle was so that Elohim could dwell among Israel, which pointed to his real dwelling place being within the mind of man. God (Elohim) claimed to "OWN" the people and Israel"

From the King James Bible comes;
A Hebrew account of the journeys, trials and errors of the Jewish nation and how we as humans came to be here on this planet Earth. For those of you who have never read it, these stories were picked up by the Romans, who's church leaders became the creators of the christian faith in 44AD. It was edited and reedited and over a span of almost 1500 years, and is the prominent faith in the United States. Those who did not believe their version of the New Testament, were called heretics by the majority rule of Rome...ie, which became the catholic church. The bible you have in your home is a product of the Catholic church and its so-called Saints whose own personal opinions formed this religion. Then they had the gaul to WRITE the New Testament based on their own beliefs which came from pagan Roman and Greek Gods.

If this isn't enough, the book of Acts in the KJ Bible plainly shows Paul as the murderer of the disciples. He hunts them down as criminals just like Jesus said.

Matthew 13:35, "I will utter things which have been kept secret from the foundation of the world."

The Gnostic Christians were called heretics and liers by the church. The wide spread murder of these so-called 'non-believers' spread to Jerusalem and beyond because Rome had control of Israel and many other countries. The new christian faith was began in Antioch Syria in 44 AD (NOT by Jesus) (Acts, xi, 27-30). The place of apprenticeship of the Apostle of the Gentiles (Acts, xi, 26), Antioch, became the headquarters of the greatn (their term) missionaries Paul and Barnabas, (according to the catholics) first together, later Paul alone.

Paul was Not a disciple except by his own proclaimation. He was NOT a friend or even a follower of Jesus. He never even knew him. His so-called 'vision' is therefore a lie. Paul's focus on the so-called suffering and death of Christ is a shame because there is so much more to be learned by Jesus' LIFE and teachings. The Nag Hammidi Scrolls lend more proof to this. Popes and others confirm this also. You will find this proof on our 'Jesus' pages and in Sylvia Brown's Book Secrets and Mysteries of the World.

Christinaity - A Catholic takeover - A Catholic fraud. - A Catholic lie.

The pontiff of Rome, under the emperor, controlled Israel, France, Spain, Germany, Italy, Africa and many other countries in 325 AD. In Christian morality there was no place for democracy, only for absolute monarchs, chosen by God (the Pope). In Christianity there were no human rights (for example, of a slave to his freedom), only obligations (thus a slave should be honest and faithful to his master, because, of course, all would be judged on the day of reckoning).

Constantine's desire to impose upon the Empire a religion that would identify obsequiousness to the deity with loyalty to the emperor found its perfect partner in Christianity - or at least in the Christianity he was to patronize. In the century before the ignoble alliance of one particular faction with the imperium many christianities had contended. Before Constantine, Christ had, for most Christians, been the ‘good shepherd’, just like Mithras and Apollo, not a celestial monarch or an imperial judge. Nor did the Christian sects dwell on the crucifixion scene:

‘They shrink from the recollection of the servile and degrading death inflicted on their lord, and conceive salvation in the gentle terms of the friendship of Christ, not in the panoply of imperial triumphs.’ (Oxford History, p14)

"The Roman Catholic Church has removed 218 priests from their positions this year because of child sexual abuse allegations, but at least 34 known offenders remain in church jobs"- Reuters (June 9 2002).
31 July, 2003 "Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith" condemns same sex deviants who seek marriage. In contrast, no Vatican condemnation of priestly paedophiles. more examples, see.. Catholic rule by Kenneth Humphreys

In the closing years of the fourth century, draconian laws prohibiting non-Christian beliefs were enacted by the new hero of the Christians, Emperor Theodosius. Heresy was now equated with treason and thus became a capital offence. Theodosius 'the Great' presided over the destruction of temples and icons, the burning of books and libraries, and a rampage of murder of pagan priests, scholars and philosophers. The wisdom and finesse of an entire civilization was sacrificed on the altar of the Christian godman and delivered Europe into a dark age of barbarism and crass superstition. Only the very brave, the very foolish or the very hidden would now deny their Christianity. The prologue to the Dark Age (written by Kenneth Humphreys), had been written.

The real followers of Jesus were killed and wiped out by a Roman operative named Paul and this murder of Gnostic Christians began with a judge named Philly the Younger and continued with the emperor Constintine in 325 AD. Proof of the 'Gnostic' faith of the disciples is present in the on-line Catholic encyclopedia. The links are on our 'Death of the disciples' pages and our Josephus Matthias Page.. The family connection of Jesus with Josephus is revealed.

An even more dangerous and deadly association

To affirm that there exists a more dangerous sacred Mafia in the Vatican than both the Sicilian and New York Mafias combined may appear monstrous or as an invention of an atheist or hardcore enemy of the Catholic Church, above all when the person saying it is an unexcommunicated Monsignor and Vaticanist priest who still has his canonical licenses. We have forever been taught that the clandestine organization of wicked criminals who meet in secret to weave traps and strategies for assassinations, and whose terroristic results kidnappings, assassinations, murders, fraudulent thefts, drug dealings, money launderings, etc, - appear daily in the press, is an irreligious Mafia without a criminal conscience. But the truth is that the most Satanic and dangerous Mafia of all, which resides in the Vatican, is hidden from us: Rome’s aristocratic and sacrilegious Mafia. History has singled out many famous criminals such as Al Capone, etc . . . The untouchables appear in movies, and many voluminous books have been written which always associate these Mafias and their thugs with the sacred Mafia of the Vatican . For this I invite the lector to read the following books, so he may be able in his doubts to know the true history and reality of the Vatican’s Mafia, and that this servant is not just inventing these things to discredit the Vatican. I am a Christian and a reformer. I love Jesus Christ and his Holy Church, whose center can not be the Vatican. You yourself can prove this. Please consult the bibliographies which I insert at the end.

One Vatican group that has extremely close ties to the Knights of Malta is the ultra-right-wing Opus Dei. This is an immensely powerful faction in the Vatican today, and its public "do good" activities eclipse a plethora of the darkest political and financial machinations known to man. It will not come as a surprise, perhaps, that Carone was closely associated with Opus Dei and, in particular, with a covert operation that had its origin back in 1944. This was Operation Amadeus.
see..The Mafia, The CIA, & The Vatican's Intelligence Apparatus

From a book by Paul Williams; There is no disputing the fact that the Vatican, by which I mean the clerical bureaucracy which controls and leads the Roman Catholic Church, is a very powerful and secretive organization. There is also little disputing the fact that great power and great secrecy typically help an organization to become corrupt. Has the same occurred with the Vatican?

Put this way, it seems unreasonable to think that somehow the Vatican has managed to escape the sorts of corruption that have afflicted every other human enterprise through history, especially considering just how long the Vatican has had in order to succumb to the temptations of greed and power. On the other hand, it's not enough to simply suggest that the Vatican is susceptible to corruption - can a case be made that it *has succumbed to corruption?

That's what Paul L. Williams tries to do in his recent book The Vatican Exposed: Money, Murder, and the Mafia. Williams, who holds a doctorate in philosophy and a masters of divinity in church history from Drew University and who has taught religion and philosophy at the University of Scranton and Wilkes University, argues that the seeds of corruption were planted very early on when Constantine made Christianity the state religion, thus linking the Catholic Church with political power. This was a difficult time for Pope Miltiades, but he managed to cope well enough:

Miltiades was befuddled. What was transpiring before him was too bizarre to be true! Two worlds had collided. The world of Caesar with its riches and power, its pomp and splendor, was a world to be shunned. The world of Christ was a world of poverty and service, of persecution and self-denial. ... Militades died in a regal bed, surrounded by attendants. The old bishop was succeeded by Sylvester, who reigned for nearly twenty-two years. During this time the pope came to wield secular power.

And so began a long, gradual slide away from principles of self-denial and towards the greed for power and money that accompany any sort of corruption. Today the extent of the Vatican's holdings are unknown, but a major shift occurred in 1929 when Pope Pius XI signed the Lateran Treaty with Mussolini - an act which did a lot to help Mussolini solidify his own power in Italy. At the time the Vatican was destitute, lacking sufficient funding to maintain its buildings or get the rats out of the walls. Currently, conservative estimates put the gold reserves of the Vatican above those of some industrialized countries, and its real-estate holdings larger than the land area of some nations.

A deal with Mussolini was a deal with terror and fascism, but it wasn't all that different than the deal with Constantine - it's a pattern that the Vatican has not shied away from even today. The quest for financial power led to heavy investments in fascist Italy (effectively ending ancient bans on usury), a concordat with Nazi Germany that ended Catholic political organizations in exchange for the Nazis collecting massive amounts of taxes which flowed to the Vatican, not to mention deals with fascist Croats and Mafia hoodlums.

Today, the bulk of the financial power of the Vatican (not to mention its corruption) seems to lie in the Instituto per le Opere di Religione, commonly known as the Vatican Bank:

Despite its claims otherwise, the Vatican Bank is not a branch of the State of Vatican City. (Stato della Citta del Vaticano). It exists as an entity unto itself without corporate or ecclesiastical ties to any other agency within the Holy See. It is under the direct supervision of the pope. He is the one and only stockholder. He owns it; he controls it.

Unlike any other financial institution, the Vatican Bank is audited by neither internal nor outside agencies. Its worth remains a matter of conjecture, even for members of the College of Cardinals. There is not a scrap of its papers among all of the other bureaucracies of the Roman Church - not even ecclesiastical financial agencies - that attests to its assets or accounts. In 1996 Cardinal Edmund Szoka, the internal auditor of the Holy See, told investigators that he has no authority over the Vatican Bank and has no knowledge of its operations.

Much of Williams' book involves an investigation of the activities of the Vatican Bank and those who have represented it in the name of the pope. Murder, mobsters, fraud...the title of the book may be rather lurid, but if only a portion of what Williams writes is true, then the title is also quite accurate and fair.

The making of 'Mary', the Holy virgin Mother of God.

From the 'copied' pagan gospels

Our investigation led us to this; Haiwa which means ("life"), The Arabic name for Eve.
She is not mentioned by name in the Koran, but referred to as Adam's spouse (Koran 2:35, 7:189). She was created by God as a spouse for Adam so that they could live in the Garden together. They were warned not to approach a certain tree. This tree had a very sweet smell, the best in the garden, called qamh. Eve was tempted by Iblis, who had become her friend by his glib talking, to eat from the tree fruit. Only by eating its fruit, he told her, would she be able to have children. When Adam learned what she had done, he followed her example, though more hesitantly, because he knew she would be cast out of paradise and he wanted to protect her against the hard life on earth.

An Islamic version of the virgin Mary - Maryam; The mother of Prophet Isa (Alaih Assalaam) was called Maryam. Some people also call her Mary. She was a very pious woman and once, an angel of Allah came to her and said: Soon you will have a son. But how can I have a son? Maryam asked. I have no husband. The angel replied: Allah is almighty. When He wishes something, then it will happen. You will have a son, and his name shall be Isa, and he will be a great prophet of Allah.

When Isa was born, Maryam was on her own. She was very sad and hungry, for she had nothing to eat. But Allah came to her aid. He made a stream flow and a tree with nourishing fruits grew in the place where Maryam lived. Now, she would not have to suffer thirst and hunger. Later Maryam returned to her family. They were very curious about the child and asked: How did you get him? But Maryam did not answer. Instead, she just pointed to the child. Don't be silly, Maryam! The people admonished her. How can we ask a child, who is still in the cradle? But just then, to their amazement, they heard the child say: I am the servant of Allah. He has given me the scripture and made me His prophet. We, mankind, should worship only Allah and help the poor and give them some of our money.

Is this, or is it not a close copy of Luke in the KJ Bible? And how about this; A Norse legend copied from page 72 of The Book of Hiram, Christopher Knight and Robert Lomas - 2004 states;
One of Odin's other names is Lord of the Gallows, a name he derives from his decision to experience death and learn the secrets of the grave. He has himself nailed to the great tree of Yggdrasil, saying;
I hung from the windswept tree, hung there nine long nights; I was pierced with a spear; I was an offering to Odin, myself to myself. It also contains; These are the words of Odin before there were man. These were his words, after his death, when he rose again.

Odin learns from wise giants, he learns from seeresses whom he raises from the dead and from hanged men; and in this myth Odin makes the supreme sacrifice. He dies so as to win the occult (secret) wisdom possessed only by the dead, and rises again to use that wisdom in the world of the living. Odin screeches or shrieks before he dies.

"In 1917, the Virgin appeared in Fatima. "The Mother of God" was a smashing success, playing to overflow crowds. As a result, the Socialists of Portugal suffered a major defeat.

"Roman Catholics world-wide began praying for the conversion of Russia and the Jesuits invented the Novenas to Fatima which they could perform throughout North Africa, spreading good public relations to the Muslim world. The Arabs thought they were honoring the daughter of Muhammad, which is what the Jesuits wanted them to believe.

"As a result of the vision of Fatima, Pope Pius XII ordered his Nazi army to crush Russia and the Orthodox religion and make Russia Roman Catholic." A few years after he lost World war II, Pope Pius XII startled the world with his phoney dancing sun vision to keep Fatima in the news. It was great religious show biz and the world swallowed it.

"Not surprisingly, Pope Pius was the only one to see this vision. As a result, a group of followers has grown into a Blue Army world-wide, totaling millions of faithful Roman Catholics ready to die for the blessed virgin.
"But we haven’t seen anything yet. The Jesuits have their Virgin Mary scheduled to appear four or five times in China, Russia, and major appearance in the U.S.

"What has this got to do with Islam? Note Bishop Sheen’s statement: "Our Lady’s appearances at Fatima marked the turning point in the history of the world’s 350 million Muslims. After the death of his daughter, Muhammad wrote that she "is the most holy of all women in Paradise, next to Mary."

"He believed that the Virgin Mary chose to be known as Our Lady of Fatima as a sign and a pledge that the Muslims who believe in Christ’s virgin birth, will come to believe in His divinity.

"Bishop Sheen pointed out that the pilgrim virgin statues of Our Lady of Fatima were enthusiastically received by Muslims in Africa, India, and elsewhere, and that many Muslims are now coming into the Roman Catholic Church."
Double Cross, Chick Publ, pgs 13,14. The Meaning of the Glorious Koran, Pickthall, Mentor Books, pgs, 220,221; Martin Lings, Muhammad, pgs 81-84.

This brings up another question; Did the catholics create the Islamic religion too? Some think they did... see Forum Where does Islam come from?

There are many versions as we repeat the stories of the Gods and kings from all parts of the known world of long ago...on Christ's Mission. The point being the story of Christ is allegorical, ie. (Myth). But it was copied by the Romans ( The Catholic Church ) and turned into what people now believe is the story of real a savior. also see The 'virgin mother's' of the world.

As many are aware, the Knights were accused of heresy by a French christian pope, backed up by a christian French king named Philip. This was an attempt to 'get their money' and none of the accusations were true as history has declared. The religion of the Knights was Gnostic, pronounced 'Nostic'. The Knights pretended to be catholics until their secret was about to be exposed and Philip may have known this. The secret is the basis for this web site.

This so-called heretic religion was practiced by Adam, Seth, Enoch, Abraham, Moses, Solomon and then Jesus. What does it have to do with Freemasonry? Everything. It is where freemasonry originated. It is why the church hates Masons and forbids it's members from joining. The Templers knew about the lie the Romans imposed on the world...they knew about it long before the crusades.

Let there be no mistake, the New Testament is a fabricated story made up by Greeks and Romans. It is not believed by the Jews or anyone else in the world except christians. That isn't saying Jesus wasn't a real person however and it isn't saying some of the lessons he taught are not real and correct. The gospel of Thomas above is a good example of his actual words, but it is a gnostic text. This text is part of the Nag Hammidi collection discovered in 1947 in Egypt. Only the parables taught by Jesus in the KJ bible are to be believed, the rest is sheer fabrication.

What you are about to read is how the church controlled our beliefs and taught us to believe a lie... almost 2000 years ago. The real story of Adam and Eve is incorporated into the second part of this page.

The catholic religion claims Jesus was the founder of their 'faith', however if he didn't die on the cross the religion is baseless. The new testament was written by Romans so this alone gives us glues to the authenticators of the faith. The christian majority is still calling people 'sinners' in the U.S. and condemning everyone they choose to judge with out cause and they tend to be intolerent of anyone else who is not christian. This intolerance is what causes war.

This 'intolerance' is what we are fighting. Ignorance is the child of intolerance.

For that reason we support the total "Seperation of Church and State" and the efforts to take away the traditional 'manger scene' at any school or government building because it just didn't happen that way. Jesus was not born on Dec 25th or in 1 AD and Xmas is actually a pagan holiday originally called 'sun day' by Constintine the great who worshiped a diety called Sol Invictus and also proclaimed himself to be Christ in 325 AD.
However, the Ten Commandments are 10,000 years old and should remain where they are so that we never forget what God told us not to do. We have reproduced segments of the writings here from the
.. Egyptian Book of the Dead. We also have the link to translations of the original written in 240 BC..
see The Papyrus of Ani. The 10 Commandments are laws given to man by a god called Thoth who is not recognizied by the clergy as a true god, but these laws were written in the Egyptian Book of the Dead 5000 years before Jesus was born. They were called the Laws of Moses when the Old Testament says god wrote the 10 commandments on blocks of stone. But they were first given to men by Noah. What really happened on mount Moriah when the bible says Moses got the laws? We know. And we know Thoth had other names and we will reveal them all here...one if his other names was Enoch.

Further; The 'Christ' story has been copied from numberous pagan rituals going back to 500 BC, and is not the true story of Jesus....We have proof...so before you go any further and you want to read actual recorded historical records (facts) about this - see Christ's Mission. If you doubt this, go to any library and look up the Roman and Greek gods who's stories were used as the background for Jesus, just as the Norse god we mentioned above.

Did you ever consider that the 'christian' celebrated holiday is also very pagan to our friends who might be Muslim, Buddist, Jewish, Protestant, ect.?
If you're interested in the real story please continue..

We are here to prove there was no copy of the KJ bible distributed to anyone until after 473 AD., and only after the Catholic fathers edited everything out they didn't want the people to read. We found what they edited out and what they refused to acknowledge. These findings tend to put a different 'light' on those of us who are condemned by the 'condemners'.

The authors of Genesis seem have picked up part of their story from Hindu legends of the creation and early history of humanity. Stories of Hindu heros Adimo, Heva, Sherma,, Hama and Jiapheta apparently were replicated into legends about Adam, Eve, Shem, Ham, and Japeth. But a much older version has been found.

The Pentateuch or Torah was accepted as Law very early--according to tradition, since the time of Moses, around 1250 BC, give or take a few decades. Most documentary scholars say bits and pieces were accepted as Law from early times, but that the books did not take final form until around 400 BC. Most traditionalist scholars say the whole Law dates to Moses, but agree that Ezra did some "editing" or clarification of minor discrepancies that had arisen, thus would also agree (roughly) on the date for final form. Whenever it was finalized--or possibly even before it was finalized--the Torah was accepted as canonical. It is believed that the Torah was never allowed to be edited or corrected, not one single letter. The Torah has coded messages that are now being deciphered. see Bible code... For Judaism, it is the foundation. see Writers of the Bible

“Hell” or “Saul” (Saul is a type of the Antichrist in the OT) and you need to read this . Pope takes the 'Mark of the beast" Keep in mind that we don't agree with most of this but we used it to show to what lengths the real antichrist will go to stop the religions from combining...getting along. Of Cource they view this as the devil's plan.
The real deal; From Martin Luther [1520 A.D.] to Dr. Alexander Hislop [late 1800's], Protestant leaders have identified the Roman Catholic Pope as the Biblical False Prophet. They based their conclusions on the Paganism of the Catholic Church and on several prophecies which provide great detail concerning the False Prophet, his church, and the city in which he rules.

This is what we're talking about; "Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me." [John 14:6] "In other words, Jesus is declaring that His Way to Heaven is the only way, and that Christianity is the only valid religion on earth!" This is their interpertation and it is absolutely not true!..furthermore what Jesus said has nothing what-so-ever to do with christinity.
By the way, this exclusivity used to be cardinal doctrine within the Roman Catholic Church, for centuries!

"Friends, God is trying to get our attention here. He is trying to show us the truth of the situation facing the world today. Not only is He lining up all the prophesied "signs and wonders", but He is trying mightily to show us the identification of the False Prophet. The actual person who will be the False Prophet may not be John Paul II, but he will be the Roman Catholic Pope!"..We agree with this.

"Shiva - Shakti - The Spousal pair Shiva-Shakti (Yab-Yum) is a tantric consort image. At once the most sacred and the most mysterious path to higher consciousness, tantra is the Sacred Union of opposites. Taoists refer to these energies as yin (from yoni, i.e., the active principle) and yang (the recumbent principle). Bly, Jung and Nin point out that each individual must achieve an inner marriage of their masculine and feminine natures to encounter true balance. Hindu consort pairs epitomizing this psychic symbolism are superb representations of the social, sexual, and sacred interconnectedness of women and men. This conjunction of Shiva and Shakti expresses the sacredness of sexuality as a path to spiritual union."

The word "consort" also has great meaning when used in this context. The Tormont Webster's Illustrated Dictionary defines "consort" as a "companion or partner". But get this; Jesus had a partner or campanion and they totally denigh that.

Then they say this; "If you are a Roman Catholic, please understand that we do not hate you, nor do we hate Roman Catholicism. Our hearts go out to you, because your eternal soul is at stake. If you continue to follow Roman Catholicism, you will be eternally lost, because Catholic doctrine does not teach 'Saving Faith'"...( also their invention).
This is total hypocritical thinking. "We love you but we hate you?" The rest of this site goes on to describe Shiva as satan ect., whereas it probably shows the original religion of the ancients which was the true religion. They use scripture over and over and twist it around to try and prove a mute point. There is a false god but there is no such thing as Satan.

In his short Epistle to the Ephesians, Ignatius wrote: "Be ye not anointed with the bad odour of the doctrine of the prince of this world; let him not lead you away captive from the life which is set before you.’ Apparently this was a subtle allusion to the odour of burnt offerings in the deluded worship of the god of this world. In his Epistle to the Romans he says: "The prince of this world would fain carry me away, and corrupt my disposition towards God.’ In the long version of Ignatius’s Epistle to the Trallians he definitely identifies "the prince of this world" as "the devil".

Another early Nazarene writing the Epistle of Barnabas affords similar evidence. Clement of Alexandria ascribed this epistle to the apostle Barnabas, the companion of Paul. Barnabas warns his fellow-Nazarenes that the days are evil and that Satan possesses the power of this world.

Standing in opposition to God the Father, Satan is known as the slanderer (diabolos), from which is derived the English devil, and the Arabic Iblis. The Bible speaks of Satan as the old serpent, embodying all evil and wickedness, and full of conspiracies to keep humans enslaved to falsehood, in ignorance of truth, and in love with self and the world. But as we have already pointed out, the serpent is not the evil one and there is no Satan mentioned anywhere in the bible..

Within modern Christianity the notion of Satan is relegated to the confines of a mythical image of wrong doing or even a bizarre supernatural personality responsible for leading people into transgression of ethical and moral codes. Few Christians understand the implications of Christ’s teaching that Satan IS the god of this world" to whom humanity is in bondage.

Paul wrote to the Romans, "For to be carnally minded is death; but to be spiritually minded is life and peace". The true or inner man naturally longs for his true home. He is trapped by his ignorance and blindness in a world of corruption and ruination.

Evil is not to be considered in terms of moral or social concerns. What people may regard as crimes and vile acts, are not the essential evils. Though they may be the fruit of evil. Jesus stated that publicans and harlots - the most despised people of His day -would enter the kingdom. He forgave the adulteress, and promised paradise to the thief on the cross. Christ taught that God looks on the heart, on the inner man, not on the transient actions of the outward man. In this way He exposed the real character of evil. The apostle Paul understood this when he wrote, "To the pure all things are pure, but unto them that are defiled and unbelieving nothing is pure".

On the 10th day of Tisri in the Hebrew calendar, (October 10th), the Day of Atonement, Elohim revealed Himself to the high priest. Note; Elohim - FALSE GOD This phenomena occured one day of the year after the high priest sprinkled blood toward the Ark during his three trips into the Most Holy Place (Lev. 16th Chapter). Between the wings of the cherubim (angels) within the cloud, there appeared a bright light of Elohim called the flash of the 'shekinah'. We get into this on Goddess Worship The 'shekinah' is God's wife or the Holy Spirit and this was taught in the early Hebrew church. It was changed after the Romans influenced them that women should obey men...a false doctrine taught by early church fathers. Solomon however continued the worship of a goddess.

It also changed when he introduced this; (The church transforms Jesus into God). They focuses on Jesus' death rather than his life and teachings. The Christian doctrine teaches people to believe Jesus died for us and we must believe this in order to be saved.
It just isn't true. Jesus was a man, he didn't die - on the cross anyway. Christ isn't a man, and he is seperate from the body of Jesus. The other thing that isn't true is that humans can talk to God. The true God is not of this world. He sees what's going on but it's up to us to be moral and find our own spiritual path. We can talk to angles and they will answer our prayers if we ask for help for the right reasons. Jesus was sent to show us that path to return to the true God of Heaven. The Romans beginning with Paul tried to destroy the true teachings of the Gnostic Christians. They could not even though they killed thousands including the disciples. The Christian Gnostic path is the correct one and it is the path taught by Jesus..

Interestingly enough, Paul was an initiate and spent at least a year in the closed community where Jesus lived but he corrupted the teachings. The remaining disciples sent him away but could not stop him from spreading his lies. Paul therefore did not complete his training and corrupted the words of James, who was the true leader of the Church. He then insited a riot that resulted in James being stoned. Paul was a Roman and had infiltrated the Essene camp. He then corrupted the true teachings of Jesus.

When Yahshua the Messiah took Peter, James, and John atop Mt. Tabor, He transfigured and showed them His spiritual form in a vision ( There was NO VISION. Nowhere in any gospel do the disciples or Jesus speek of visions )(Matt 17:1-9). He revealed His glorified body to them in fulfillment of the high priest seeing the flash of the 'shekinah' once a year.
Note; you just saw this defination above refering to the Elohim God.

The spiritual reality of the 'shekinah' is the Messiah revealing Himself into our consciousness. The Apostle Paul explains it this way: "For Elohim (God), who commanded the light to shine out of darkness [the ignorance in our minds], hath shined in our hearts, to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of Elohim (God) in the face of Yahshua the Messiah (Jesus Christ, II Cor. 4:6)."

To further our point; Acts is the chapter where Paul has James stoned and hunts down the rest of the disciples and delibertly discredits them. He then uses what he has been taught, after infiltrating the Essene sect, to change the real religion Jesus and the disciples were teaching.

The Christian Church developed under Paul (also known as Saul of Tarsus) and incorporated Hellenistic thought as it appealed to goyim membership. Further, Christianity, as has been observed with many other religions competing for membership (such as religious Taoism and Buddhism in China), incorporated many elements of competing mystery cults in the Roman world, especially the popular Zarathustrian-based mystery cults of Mithraism and Manichaeism. It is no suprise, therefore, that when compared to one another Christianity and Zarathustrianism share an uncanny number of parallels, but it is not the same.

The establishment of Christianity as the state religion of the Roman Empire--and the consequent suppression of competing mystery cults--as well as the Muslim conquest of the early Middle Ages combined to form the death-knell of Zarathustrianism and its direct descendents. Zarathustrianism asserted itself for the last time in the Near East under the Sassanian Persians (226-652 CE). After the conquest of Persia by the Arabs.

Inventions of the Roman church

Praxeas wants to say that God the Father is the same as God the Son. Tertullian summarises what scripture has to say on the relationships in question, and invents the term Trinity to describe them. The Montanists have just been condemned, courtesy of the same Praxeas, and Tertullian is not happy about this either.The Montanists

On the prescription of heretics

This book is about how Christians think about heresy and respond to the arguments of heretics. Tertullian is concerned at the way Christians are disputing with heretics and pagans, and the effect this is having on believers. He feels that it is never possible to convict a heretic from the scriptures, because they simply deny the authority of whichever bit of scripture they are quoted, and shift their ground every moment. At the same time the spectacle of the dispute seems to put their opinions on the same level as that of the scriptures. In general, how do we recognise and deal with heretics - people who pretend to be Christians (Romans) but actually accept no authority but their own opinions?

Roman law made provision for 'praescriptiones' of various types, which ruled a plaintiff's case completely out of court. (cf Berger, A Encyclopedic Dictionary of Roman Law, (1953) 645 f.) Tertullian has cast a whole treatise into the form of a legal simile. To paraphrase his own words, he applies for an injunction to restrain any heretic from trespassing upon holy scripture, which is the sole property of the Christians. (Romans) On the prescription of heretics

Paul forbade discussion with heretics, and it can serve no useful purpose. For the heretics reject part of the scriptures, and pervert the sense of what they accept to suit themselves. In any discussion they must perforce impute to their opponents their own dishonest tampering with the sacred text. Appeal to scripture, therefore, will be ineffectual.

So the logic is that Christ received the truth from God and transmitted it to his apostles; they in turn handed it on to the churches they founded; outside this chain, no one can possess the truth.

Tertullian then deals with possible objections. He considers and rejects three objections:
that the apostles did not know the whole truth,
that they did not reveal all they knew,
that the heretics, so far from perverting the truth, are rescuing it from misinterpretation by the churches.(22.1ff)

He winds up by promising some detailed rebuttals of individual heretical teachings, and repeats his prohibition on heretics using the scriptures. He ends humorously with a wicked satire of the 'Christ' of the heretics, visualising him pondering his own confused doctrine aloud.

As you can see, this is a carefully laid-out system to effectively brain-wash anybody who disputed them. But here he even calls Christ a heretic but this reveals the truth, that Paul was teaching something different... "He also deals with attempts by the heretics to suggest that Paul and the other apostles did not teach the same things, in order to win space for their own heretical ideas."

Tertullian in writing to the Colossians; he says, "See that no one beguile you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, and contrary to the wisdom of the Holy Ghost." He had been at Athens, and had in his interviews (with its philosophers) become acquainted with that human wisdom which pretends to know the truth, whilst it only corrupts it, and is itself divided into its own manifold heresies, by the variety of its mutually repugnant sects.

But it's this very philosophy they used to corrupt the teachings of Christ and the disciples thereby turning the words around to suite his own goals and the goals of the church.

Fundamentalism is an attitude more than a particular belief system. It seems to be characterised by unquestioning submission to an absolute authority and intolerance of alternative view points, belief systems, and even in some cases of people who do not follow the teaching of the group. Often a god is said to be the authority that is followed, but in reality it is nothing more than a tradition. As a theology, fundamentalism is often poorly developed and frequently not able to address in a comprehensive way the scriptures of the religion that it purports to represent.

Fundamentalists often show a rather distressing [or amusing, depending on your viewpoint] tendency to dishonestly twist scriptures in order to make them align to their own inherited dogma, despite the fact that the principle of the movement is to do the reverse. Common targets of this dishonesty today include: the Bible's stance on homosexuality, the cosmology of the Bible, and Messianic prophecy in the Old Testament. While bitterly complaining that their opponents take Biblical passages out of context [not always a false accusation] in order to discredit the Bible, fundamentalists simultaneously perpetrate that crime and condemn all those who do not proof text as they say they do.

We proof read and we pick out the words that really show the truth with out changing the scripture.

Continue with.. Lies of Paul, page 2

Search this site

Our search Engine does not search for the links in this site, only words in the text.

NO PART OF THIS SITE MAY BE COPIED OR REPRODUCED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE WEBMASTER... © COPYRIGHT 1999 - 2007 C.I.C. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

This page has been visited Times since December 29th, 1999