THE ABDUCTION OF WILLIAM MORGAN
In 1821 William Morgan was a brewer, living
in York, Upper Canada. Unsuccessful in that business, he removed
to Rochester, N. Y., and wrought at his trade of stonemason. He
was a ne'er-d-well, addicted to tippling, spent most of his time
in saloons, and was a man whose word few would accept. Two years
later he changed his home to Batavia, Genesee County, in the same
State.
It is doubtful whether Morgan was ever made
a Free Mason, though he may have received the degrees in Canada.
He succeeded, however in convincing a number of the brethren that
he had passed through the "Blue Lodge," and was allowed
to enter the one at Batavia. He made oath that he had been regularly
entered, passed and raised, and he was made a Royal Arch Mason
at LeRoy, N.Y., on the last day of May, 1823. A movement was set
on foot to establish a Royal Arch Chapter at Batavia, and Morgan
signed the petition for that purpose, in 1826. His character was
so well known that most of the other signers objected to the appearance
of his name on the petition and a new one was substituted, from
which it was omitted. This curt snub not only angered Morgan,
but implanted in his sodden brain the resolve to expose the secrets
of the order, by which he was confident that he and his associates
would gain a great fortune.
He secured an ally in David C. Miller, editor
of the Republican Advocate, a weekly paper published at Batavia.
It is said that this man had received the first degree in Masonry,
but being found unworthy, was never advanced further. He was involved
in debt, and, like Morgan, believed that the treachery would make
all concerned independently rich. The editor did not shrink from
publicly announcing his purpose.
It was right here that the Masons made a
blunder which, in the language of the French, was worse than a
crime. They should have paid no attention to the treachery, and
the publication, whatever it might have been, would have fallen
flat and attracted little or no notice. Strong arguments were
made to Morgan to abandon his scheme, and he said he was willing
to do so, but Miller pushed the publication as fast as he could.
Several hot-headed Masons determined to get the manuscript. Miller's
office was set on fire in September, but the flames were extinguished
before much damage was done. A reward of $100 was offered for
the arrest and conviction of the incendiary, but the secret was
well guarded. There were not wanting those who believed that Miller
had set fire to the building as a shrewd means of advertising.
Morgan owed a sum of money to a hotel keeper
at Canandaigua, and he was arrested for the debt and taken thither.
He was acquitted, but arrested again on a similar charge, confessed
judgment and was lodged in jail. Miller was also arrested, but
he eluded the officer and fled to his home. The wife' of Morgan
hurried to Canandaigua to the aid of her husband, but learning
that the debt had been paid, returned, having been told that her
husband would speedily join her.
When several days passed without his appearance,
she became alarmed and sent a friend to learn what it meant. He
came back with word that the debt had been settled and Morgan
released, but he had hardly left jail when he was seized by Loton
Lawson and another person and hustled down the street. He resisted
violently and shouted "Murder!" Nicholas G. Chesebro
and Edward Sawyer, who with Lawson were members of the posse that
had brought Morgan from home, were spectators who refused to help
the prisoner. They followed the others, and were in turn followed
by a carriage, which soon came back and was driven toward Rochester.
It was empty when it went away, but contained several persons
on its return. The messenger of Mrs. Morgan reported that the
carriage reached Rochester at daybreak and was driven three miles
beyond. At that point the party left it, and the vehicle returned.
The driver swore that all the men were strangers to him and that
he saw no violence.
Here another point is reached upon which
the truth will never be clearly known. Many have contended that
no personal harm was intended, but that the purpose of the abductors
was to compel Morgan to abandon his scheme and to leave the country,
the promise being made to him that he would be provided with a
liberal sum of money. It is said further that he agreed to do
as proposed, that he received the money and buried himself out
of sight of all his former acquaintances. Reports came from time
to time that he had been recognized in South America, in Turkey,
in the wilds of Canada, and in other parts of the world, but all
these reports were baseless. The miserable fellow had disappeared
as utterly as if the ground had opened and swallowed him from
human sight.
The high-handed outrage started a wave of
excitement which swept over the entire country. The abduction
of Morgan was without palliation, even if no personal harm was
meditated against him. The guilty parties should have been punished
with the utmost rigor of the law. Among the thousands who hotly
condemned the crime were leading Free Masons, who gave their help
to running down the criminals.
As is invariably the case, the innocent
had to suffer for the guilty. Public meetings were held in Batavia
and elsewhere, in which the fraternity was denounced in the fiercest
terms. Only those who lived in the border States at the outbreak
of the Civil War can form any idea of the irrestrainable rage
that was stirred to its depths. Although Governor Dc Witt Clinton
was a prominent Mason, he issued a proclamation, October 7, 1826,
calling upon all officers and ministers of justice to use the
most efficient measures to arrest the offenders and to bring them
to justice. Shortly after he followed with a second proclamation,
offering a reward for the arrest and conviction of the guilty
persons. In the following March, a third proclamation promised
$1000 to any one who, "as accomplice or co-operator, shall
make a full discovery of the offender or offenders."
The investigations thus set on foot showed
that when the men left the carriage beyond Rochester on the fateful
morning, they entered another vehicle and went westward by the
way, of Clarkson, Gaines, Lewiston and thus to Fort Niagara, where
they arrived the following morning. On a portion of the journey,
Sheriff Bruce of the county was with them. At Fort Niagara the
four men dismissed the carriage and made their way to the fort,
which was near at hand. Beyond this it was impossible to trace
the parties farther. With them disappeared William Morgan.
In arriving at a clear judgment of the truth
concerning this lamentable affair, it must be borne in mind that
naturally both parties to the controversy were biased. The accusers
of the fraternity were impulsive, hot headed, intemperate and
unjust, inasmuch as they laid the blame at the door of the order,
when in truth the vast majority condemned the crime as warmly
as their opponents. On the other hand; the Free Masons labored
to make the case as favorable as they could. By that is meant
that they insisted that no personal harm was intended or ever
perpetrated against the man, who willingly agreed to guide himself
in accordance with the wishes of his abductors.
The father of the writer was a neighbor
of Morgan, knew the persons accused and gave it as his belief,
expressed many years after, that Morgan was placed in a boat or
flung overboard and sent over Niagara Falls.
The direct outcome of the disappearance
of Morgan was the formation of the anti-Masonic party, whose leaders
were William H. Seward, Millard Fillmore, William Wirt (attorney-general
tinder Monroe), John Quincy Adams and that adroit politician,
Thurlow Weed. During the four years ending in 1831, some one or
other connected with the abduction was in jail, and suits were
prosecuted for a long time. Sheriff Bruce was removed from office
by Governor Clinton. He also suffered imprisonment for a year
and a half. The sheriff always contended that Morgan voluntarily
accompanied the parties who had him in charge. Loton Lawson was
sentenced for a term of two years, Nicholas G. Chesebro for one
year and Edward Sawyer for one month. The natural question that
presents itself at this point is that if Morgan was alive, why
was he not traced - as he certainly could have been - and restored
to his friends? In truth, he was and had been dead for a good
while.
The resentment against Free Masonry flamed
into a fire that threatened to sweep everything before it. In
many places, clergymen were not allowed to preach unless they
repudiated and denounced Masonry, and Masonic meetings were prevented
by force of arms. In several of the States the Grand Lodges felt
it advisable to suspend their meetings for years. In Vermont every
lodge stopped work. It is the pride of my own lodge (Trenton,
No.5) that it did not miss a single communication throughout all
those tempestuous years, being the only one in New Jersey that
thus braved the storm. The old lodge room was on the bank of the
Delaware, and in order to reach it the members stole through alleys
and along the shore till it was safe to dodge to the door where
the trembling tyler admitted them. Many of those who were warmly
attached to the order, after passing temperate resolutions, counseled
a yielding for the time to the persecution, a closing of their
work and the surrender of their charters. This was extensively
done. As evidence of the staggering blow to Masonry, it may be
stated that although the Grand Lodge of Maine met annually from
1834 to 1843, it once had not a single representative from any
lodge, and only twice during that period did it have representatives
from more than four lodges. The lodges in New Jersey were reduced
from thirty-three to six in number.
The cruelest charge was that Governor Clinton
committed suicide in 1828 because of his remorse for sanctioning
the death of Morgan. Only a few months before his death he had
declared that Free Masonry was no more responsible for the acts
of unworthy members, than any other institution or association.
No occurrence, however tragic, is safe from
misuse by the politicians. More than a hundred anti-Masonic newspapers
sprang into existence, whose venomous opposition was beyond description.
Chief among these was the Albany Evening Journal, under the control
of Thurlow Weed, a representative of Monroe County in the Legislature.
No language was too inflammatory for this and the other papers.
On October 7, 1827, the body of a drowned
man was found on the beach of Lake Ontario, forty miles from Niagara.
It was so decomposed that recognition was impossible, and the
coroner's jury, having rendered a verdict of accidental death,
the remains were buried. The golden opportunity was not lost by
Weed. He and several men, including David C. Miller, had the grave
reopened. At the second inquest, Mrs. Morgan and other witnesses
identified the body of her husband. The fact that the clothing
was such as Morgan had never been known to wear, and that he had
been missing for more than a year, and that no perceptible physical
resemblance could be noted, did not prevent the official declaration
that the remains were those of William Morgan. It was on this
occasion that Thurlow Weed is said to have replied to the absurdity
of the whole business by the grim declaration, "It's a good
enough Morgan till after election."
The evidence that the remains were not those
of the Morgan became so clear that a third inquest was held in
the latter part of 1827. It was then established beyond question
that the body was that of Timothy Monro, whose boat had been upset
while crossing the river some weeks previous.
Thurlow Weed, in a letter published September
9, 1882, said that John Whitney, while at his house in 1831, confessed
that he and four others, whom he named, told Morgan, who was confined
in a magazine at Fort Niagara, that arrangements had been made
for sending him to Canada, where his family would soon follow
him; that Morgan consented and walked with the party to a boat,
which was rowed to the mouth of the river, where a rope was wound
around Morgan's body, to each end of which a sinker was attached,
and he was then thrown overboard.
Weed said he could not in honor reveal a
secret thus imparted to him. Twenty-nine years later, when Weed
was attending a National Republican Convention in Chicago, where
John Whitney lived, the latter called upon him with the request
that he would write out what he had told him in 1831, have it
witnessed, sealed up and published after his death. Weed promised
to do so, but in the hurry and excitement of the convention which
nominated Abraham Lincoln for the Presidency, he overlooked the
matter. In 1861, Weed while in London wrote to Whitney, asking
him to get Alexander B. Williams of Chicago to perform the duty
which Weed had so unpardonably neglected. Whitney died just before
the letter reached Chicago.
Such was Weed's statement, but the fact
remains that Whitney did not die until eight years after the date
given by Weed, and witnesses came forward who declared that they
heard Whitney angrily protest to Weed against his persistent falsehoods
about him.
To return, the anti-Masonic party grew rapidly
in numbers. At first it was confined to western New York, where,
in 1828, its candidate; or Governor received 33,345 votes, not
enough, however, to elect him. In the following year, in the State
election, the anti-Masons carried fifteen counties and polled
67,000 votes. In 1830 and 1832, Francis Granger, the nominee of
the anti-Masonic party, received a large vote, but not sufficient
in either case to bring him success.
In the State of New York, the vote of 33,345
in 1828 rose to 156,672 in 1832. In the last-named year the anti-Masonic
party entered the Presidential field, nominating William Wirt
of Maryland and Amos Ellmaker of Pennsylvania respectively for
President and Vice-President. This ticket received all the electoral
votes of Vermont. It should be noted, too, that in 1836 Francis
Granger was nominated on the ticket with General William Henry
Harrison. After that the opposition to Free Masonry died out almost
as rapidly as it had arisen, and the order was never more flourishing
than it is today.
Those who recall the devious ways of Thurlow
Weed will hardly believe the statement he made about John Whitney,
in view of the inaccuracy that his London letter of 1861 did not
reach Chicago until after the death of Whitney, who lived until
1869. Whitney did leave a statement, which was not to be published
until after his death, and not then unless a new attack should
be made upon Free Masonry.
Whitney declared that the plan from inception
to completion had in view nothing more than a deportation of Morgan,
by friendly agreement between the parties, either to Canada or
some other country. Ample means were provided for the support
of Morgan's family, and for giving him a fair start in life. Morgan
agreed to everything proposed. He was to destroy all MSS., gradually
cease drinking, refuse to meet his former partners, and to go
to Canada, if necessary, on an hour's notice. When he reached
his appointed place, he was to be paid $500 upon his written pledge
not to return to the States. His family were to be sent to him
with as little delay as possible.
It will be recalled that Morgan was released
from jail upon the payment of his debt. This was part of the prearranged
plan, and Morgan understood it all. Unfortunately he had obtained
liquor, which always made him violent, and he fiercely resisted,
till he realized his mistake, when he yielded and got into the
carriage as quietly as did the other members of the party. Whitney
accompanied the coach from Canandaigua. The sheriff joined the
party at Wright's Corners and they drove to Youngstown, where
they called upon Colonel William King, an officer of the War of
1812.
From this point we quote:
"King and Bruce got into the carriage
together and had a long conversation with Morgan. The whole transaction
was gone over and Morgan gave his assent and concurrence therewith.
"On arriving near the fort, the driver
(not a Mason) was dismissed and the coach sent back. The ferryboat
was ready and the party went immediately on board. It was rowed
by Elisha Adams nearly opposite the fort and about a mile from
the Canadian village of Niagara. Leaving Morgan in the boat, three
of the party went to the village and met a committee of two Canadian
Masons as agreed.
"No official inquiry has ever brought
out the names of these, and I shall ever be silent concerning
them. We came back to the boat, the Canadian brethren bringing
a lantern. Bruce called Morgan up the bank, out of the boat, and
the .party sat down together on 'the grass. Now Colonel King required
of Morgan the most explicit consent to the movements that had
brought him there. By the aid of questions from the whole party,
Morgan admitted as follows:
" '(1) That he had contracted with
Miller and others to write an exposition of Masonry, for which
he was to receive a compensation.
" '(2) That he had never been made
a Mason in any lodge, but had received the Royal Arch degree in
a regular manner.
" '(3) That Miller and the other partners
had utterly failed to fulfill the terms of the contract with him.
" '(4) That Whitney had paid him $50,
as agreed, and he had agreed to destroy the written and printed
work as far as possible and furnish no more, and that before leaving
Batavia' he had done what he promised in that way.
" '(5) That it was impossible now for
Miller to continue the "illustrations" as he [Morgan]
had written them. If he published any book, it would have to be
made from some other person's materials.
" '(6) That he had been treated by
Chesebro, Whitney, Bruce, and all of them with perfect kindness
on the journey.
" '(7) That he was willing and anxious
to be separated from Miller and from all idea of a Masonic expose';
wished to go into the interior of Canada and settle down as a
British citizen; wished to have his family sent to him as soon
as possible; expected $500 when he reached the place, as agreed
upon; expected more money from year to year, to help him, if necessary.
" '(8) Finally he expressed his sorrow
for the uproar his proceedings had made, sorrow for the shame
and mortification of his friends, and had "no idea that David
C. Miller was such a d - scoundrel as he had turned out to be.'
"
"We had ascertained at the village
that the Canadian brethren would be ready to perform their part
and remove Morgan westward by the latter part of that or the first
of the succeeding 'week, but objected so strenuously to having
him remain among them in the meantime, that it was agreed that
he [Morgan] should be taken to the American side until the Canadians
should notify us that they were ready.
"This was explained to Morgan, and
he agreed to it. It was then understood that he was to remain
in the magazine without attempting to get out until matters were
arranged for his removal. The party then rowed back, and Morgan
was left in the bomb proof of the magazine.
"The party then left, breakfasted at
Youngstown, and went up to Lewiston on the Rochester boat that
passed up, with passengers for the Royal Arch installation that
occurred there that day. There was quite a company of us there,
and the intelligence was freely communicated that Morgan was in
Fort Niagara, and the greatest satisfaction was expressed at the
news that the manuscripts and printed sheets had been destroyed,
and that in a few days Morgan would be effectually separated from
the company that had led to his ruin. During the day it was reported
to us at Lewiston that 'Morgan had gone into theatricals,' and
was shouting and alarming the people in the vicinity. Nothing
would quiet him except rum, which was given him.
"Lawson, Whitney and a few others remained
in the vicinity until Sunday night, when the two Canadian brethren
came over, received Morgan, receipted to Whitney for the money
[$500] and crossed to the west side of the river.
"They traveled on horseback-three horses
in the party; Monday night they rode some thirty miles farther
to a point near the present city of Hamilton, where the journey
ended. Morgan signed a receipt for the $500. He also signed a
declaration of the facts in the case.
"We supposed we could at any time trace
him up. We felt that the craft would be the gainer by our labors.
We were prepared to send his wife and children to him as agreed.
We supposed that that was the end of it.
What a tremendous blunder we all made! It
was scarcely a week until we saw that trouble was before us. It
was not a fortnight until Colonel King sent a confidential messenger
into Canada to see Morgan and prepare to bring him back.
"But alas! he who had sold his friends
at Batavia had also sold us. He had gone. He had left the village
within forty-eight hours after the departure of those who had
taken him there. He was traced east to a point down the river
not far from Port Hope, where he sold his horse and disappeared.
He had doubtless got on board a vessel there and sailed out of
the country. At any rate, that was the last we ever heard of him."
Go To Previous Page Go To Next Page
No © Copyright.
"Corky" .
Free To Use.
All material in this site may be used
to educate everyone, Masons and
non-Masons alike about Freemasonry